Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Connors Keven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Connors Keven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Connors Keven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Connors Keven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:34 | 07:53 to 05:19 | 47.0% |
| Run Total | 02:18 | 46:35 to 44:17 | 42.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 05:29 to 05:06 | 7.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:26 to 02:13 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Connors Keven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:33 | 04:33 -00:12 | 04:47 -01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 07:54 | 05:17 -00:10 | 09:20 -01:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 13:01 | 03:07 -00:35 | 14:37 -01:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 15:33 | 05:46 +00:01 | 17:44 -02:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:29 | 21:20 | 05:23 +00:06 | 23:30 -02:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 26:49 | 05:44 +00:16 | 28:53 -02:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:17 | 32:49 | 05:56 -00:39 | 34:37 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 38:06 | 05:56 +00:25 | 40:33 -02:27 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 44:27 | 04:58 -00:09 | 46:29 -02:02 |
| Running 6 | 06:21 | 49:16 | 05:47 +00:34 | 51:27 -02:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 55:37 | 02:21 +00:05 | 57:14 -01:37 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 58:03 | 05:44 +00:30 | 59:35 -01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:53 | 01:04:17 | 05:33 +02:20 | 01:05:19 -01:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:16 | 01:12:10 | 06:31 +00:45 | 01:10:52 +01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:19:26 | 07:11 -01:20 | 01:17:23 +02:03 |
| Roxzone | 07:04 | 01:32:12 | 07:38 -00:34 | 01:32:12 |
Keven Connors delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, finishing in the top 36% overall and in his age group. His running performance indicates a more strength-oriented profile, as his total running time was slightly slower than average. Keven started the race very strong, evident from his fast initial running segment (Running 1), which was significantly faster than average. However, his later running segments show a decline, suggesting he might have started too fast and struggled to maintain the pace as fatigue set in. Despite this, his transitions in the Roxzone were quicker than average, showcasing efficient strategy in non-exercise transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Müller Dominik | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:32:37 | |
| Lawton Daniel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:47 | |
| Suchanke Tobias | 2019 Hamburg | 01:32:00 | |
| Klatt Thorsten | 2022 Bremen | 01:31:52 | |
| Fraga David | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:10 | |
| Merrill Grant | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:32:42 | |
| Warns Aljoscha | 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:27 | |
| Mok Jong Ho | 2024 Incheon | 01:32:28 | |
| Perry David | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:09 | |
| Martinez JeanChristophe | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
