Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Comerford Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Comerford Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Comerford Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Comerford Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:32 | 57:48 to 48:16 | 87.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:19 | 07:53 to 06:34 | 12.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:21 to 03:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:08 to 07:08 | 0.0% |
| Comerford Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 05:09 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:56 | 04:40 -00:14 | 05:09 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 08:22 | 05:38 +00:59 | 09:49 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:59 | 03:26 -00:41 | 15:27 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:12 | 17:44 | 06:10 +01:02 | 18:53 -01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 03:21 | 24:56 | 05:55 -02:34 | 25:03 -00:07 |
| Running 4 | 07:18 | 28:17 | 06:10 +01:08 | 30:58 -02:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:53 | 35:35 | 06:41 +01:12 | 37:08 -01:33 |
| Running 5 | 08:42 | 43:28 | 06:26 +02:16 | 43:49 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 52:10 | 05:09 -00:32 | 50:15 +01:55 |
| Running 6 | 07:35 | 56:47 | 06:15 +01:20 | 55:24 +01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:04:22 | 02:33 -00:18 | 01:01:39 +02:43 |
| Running 7 | 07:50 | 01:06:37 | 06:14 +01:36 | 01:04:12 +02:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 01:14:27 | 06:18 -01:34 | 01:10:26 +04:01 |
| Running 8 | 08:42 | 01:19:11 | 07:18 +01:24 | 01:16:44 +02:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:08 | 01:27:53 | 08:11 -01:03 | 01:24:02 +03:51 |
| Roxzone | 06:02 | 01:40:55 | 08:42 -02:40 | 01:40:55 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Daniel's pacing seems relatively consistent throughout the race, with a few segments where he gained or lost time. His total running time of 00:57:48 was 11:21 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus more on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his running segments (Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8) were slower than average, suggesting that he could benefit from specific running training.
In conclusion, Daniel Comerford showcased a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Dublin, placing him in a competitive position among his peers. By targeting specific areas of improvement, such as running speed, endurance, and strength, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing the suggested training strategies, drills, and race strategies will help him become a more well-rounded and efficient athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dmuchowski Michał | 2024 Katowice | 01:41:17 | |
| Dileo Samuel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:40:53 | |
| Philippou Andrew | 2022 London | 01:40:37 | |
| Zink Andrew | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:41:17 | |
| Le Michael | 2024 Anaheim | 01:41:23 | |
| Bode Sebastian | 2023 Wien | 01:40:57 | |
| Kennedy Paul | 2024 Berlin | 01:41:23 | |
| Burthem Stuart | 2024 Madrid | 01:40:50 | |
| Hardy Alex | 2024 Dallas | 01:40:44 | |
| Goodsell Marcus | 2024 London | 01:40:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Stockholm | 01:36:50 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:48:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
