Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Woods Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Woods Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Woods Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Woods Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:47 | 54:15 to 44:28 | 98.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:26 to 02:14 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Woods Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 04:49 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:50 | 04:33 -00:09 | 04:49 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 08:14 | 05:18 -00:13 | 09:22 -01:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 13:19 | 03:08 -00:57 | 14:40 -01:21 |
| Running 3 | 08:22 | 15:30 | 05:46 +02:36 | 17:48 -02:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:02 | 23:52 | 05:23 -01:21 | 23:34 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 27:54 | 05:45 -00:18 | 28:57 -01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:13 | 33:21 | 05:58 -00:45 | 34:42 -01:21 |
| Running 5 | 08:36 | 38:34 | 05:57 +02:39 | 40:40 -02:06 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 47:10 | 04:58 -00:04 | 46:37 +00:33 |
| Running 6 | 08:36 | 52:04 | 05:48 +02:48 | 51:35 +00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 01:00:40 | 02:22 +00:04 | 57:23 +03:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 01:03:06 | 05:45 -00:12 | 59:45 +03:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 01:08:39 | 05:34 -00:45 | 01:05:30 +03:09 |
| Running 8 | 08:48 | 01:13:28 | 06:32 +02:16 | 01:11:04 +02:24 |
| Wall Balls | 04:51 | 01:22:16 | 07:13 -02:22 | 01:17:36 +04:40 |
| Roxzone | 05:30 | 01:32:31 | 07:42 -02:12 | 01:32:31 |
Paul Woods performed remarkably well in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, with an overall ranking in the top 77% of all athletes and top 75% of athletes in his age group (45-49). Noteworthy strengths include his quick transitions, reflected in a Roxzone time that was significantly faster than average. However, a clear area for improvement is his total running time, which was 08:21 slower than the average time.
Paul started the race strong, with his running times in the first four segments being faster than average. However, he seemed to struggle in the second half of the race, with slower running times in segments 5, 6, and 8. This suggests that he may have started the race too fast and struggled to maintain this pace towards the end.
Based on the results, Paul appears to be a hybrid athlete, demonstrating both running and strength capabilities. However, he may benefit from further developing his running endurance.
Implementing strategic pacing could greatly improve Paul's race performance. Instead of starting out too fast, he should aim for a steady, sustainable pace, gradually increasing his speed throughout the race. This strategy could help conserve energy for the later, more challenging segments of the race. Additionally, practicing transitions between running and strength segments could further reduce his overall race time.
Moreover, integrating a well-rounded recovery strategy, including adequate hydration, nutrition, and rest, can enhance race-day performance and recovery post-race. Lastly, regular practice races can help Paul familiarize himself with the race course and anticipate challenges, enabling him to better strategize and prepare.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Charlemandrier Kevin | 2024 Paris | 01:32:37 | |
| Löwenstein Fabian | 2022 Essen | 01:32:04 | |
| Mcconnon Sean | 2023 Dublin | 01:32:53 | |
| Corradi Maurizio | 2024 Milan | 01:32:36 | |
| Morris Darren | 2022 Birmingham | 01:32:30 | |
| Noakes Tanner | 2023 Dallas | 01:32:40 | |
| Cunningham Oisin | 2023 Dublin | 01:32:35 | |
| Zwilling Kai | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:32:28 | |
| Lawson Marc | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:51 | |
| Schmitz Ivan | 2024 Maastricht | 01:32:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:52 | |
| 2023 London | 01:38:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
