Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Williams Max's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Williams Max's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Williams Max's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Williams Max's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:57 | 49:42 to 46:45 | 60.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:38 | 07:11 to 05:33 | 33.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 07:45 to 07:28 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Williams Max | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:54 | 00:00 | 05:01 -01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:54 | 04:38 -00:24 | 05:01 -01:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:29 | 08:08 | 05:28 +00:01 | 09:39 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:13 | 13:37 | 03:18 -00:05 | 15:07 -01:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:40 | 16:50 | 05:59 +00:41 | 18:25 -01:35 |
| Sled Pull | 07:11 | 23:30 | 05:42 +01:29 | 24:24 -00:54 |
| Running 4 | 07:24 | 30:41 | 06:01 +01:23 | 30:06 +00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 38:05 | 06:26 -01:05 | 36:07 +01:58 |
| Running 5 | 07:10 | 43:26 | 06:15 +00:55 | 42:33 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 50:36 | 05:06 -00:09 | 48:48 +01:48 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 55:33 | 06:03 +00:15 | 53:54 +01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:01:51 | 02:27 -00:12 | 59:57 +01:54 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 01:04:06 | 06:04 +00:11 | 01:02:24 +01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:10:21 | 06:04 -00:37 | 01:08:28 +01:53 |
| Running 8 | 06:35 | 01:15:48 | 07:01 -00:26 | 01:14:32 +01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 07:45 | 01:22:23 | 07:50 -00:05 | 01:21:33 +00:50 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:37:43 | 08:20 -00:38 | 01:37:43 |
Looking at the splits analysis, Max performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 segment, completing it 00:56 faster than the average time. He also excelled in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, finishing them 00:20 and 00:29 faster than average, respectively. Additionally, Max showed strength in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, completing it 00:44 faster than average. However, he struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
By implementing these training strategies, techniques, and race strategies, Max Williams can enhance his performance in the Hyrox race. Improving his running performance, particularly in the identified segments, will contribute to a more competitive overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Eric | 2023 Chicago | 01:37:29 | |
| Prifogle Ben | 2022 Chicago | 01:37:57 | |
| Kirby Arri | 2024 London | 01:37:51 | |
| Wenhold Hermann | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:38:05 | |
| Lishman Ashley | 2024 Madrid | 01:37:33 | |
| Wickett Gary | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:18 | |
| Wong Rax | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:37:16 | |
| Zamros Hafiz | 2024 Singapore | 01:37:52 | |
| Lauriks Wout | 2024 Maastricht | 01:38:13 | |
| Apeldoorn Stan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 02:09:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
