Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Webb Graeme's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Webb Graeme's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Webb Graeme's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Webb Graeme's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:33 | 08:16 to 05:43 | 58.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 08:14 to 07:20 | 20.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 06:02 to 05:28 | 13.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:42 to 04:36 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:29 to 02:23 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:17 to 03:12 | 1.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 06:08 to 06:06 | 0.8% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:02 to 05:00 | 0.8% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:45 to 44:45 | 0.0% |
| Webb Graeme | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:36 | 04:37 +00:05 | 04:59 -01:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 08:18 | 05:26 -00:21 | 09:36 -01:18 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 13:23 | 03:15 +00:02 | 15:02 -01:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 16:40 | 05:59 -00:23 | 18:17 -01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 06:02 | 22:16 | 05:40 +00:22 | 24:16 -02:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 28:18 | 05:55 -00:20 | 29:56 -01:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:08 | 33:53 | 06:22 -00:14 | 35:51 -01:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 40:01 | 06:10 -00:23 | 42:13 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 45:48 | 05:03 -00:01 | 48:23 -02:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 50:50 | 05:58 +00:03 | 53:26 -02:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 56:51 | 02:25 +00:04 | 59:24 -02:33 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 59:20 | 05:57 +00:05 | 01:01:49 -02:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:16 | 01:05:22 | 05:55 +02:21 | 01:07:46 -02:24 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:13:38 | 06:53 +00:13 | 01:13:41 -00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 08:14 | 01:20:44 | 07:43 +00:31 | 01:20:34 +00:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:46 | 01:36:35 | 08:18 -00:32 | 01:36:35 |
Graeme Webb delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 423 out of 1014 athletes, placing him in the top 41%. Within his age group (45-49), he ranked 38th, placing him in the top 36%. His overall time was 01:36:35, with a total running time of 00:44:45, which is 02:55 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability.
Graeme's running performance was notably better than average, suggesting a runner profile. This indicates that his strength lies in running rather than strength-based exercises. Analysis of his splits reveals he started the race with a strong pace, especially in the early running segments, but his performance declined slightly in strength-based exercises towards the end, such as the Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ponciano Adonis | 2024 New York | 01:36:39 | |
| Last Mathias | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:36:19 | |
| Roos Jan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:26 | |
| Lachermaier Kai | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:36:51 | |
| Arrowsmith Andrew | 2022 Manchester | 01:36:17 | |
| Hernandez Lopez David | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:36:33 | |
| Cray Steven | 2024 Dublin | 01:37:03 | |
| Howard Christian | 2021 Dallas | 01:36:48 | |
| Bonniez Olivier | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:36:38 | |
| Butlin Simon | 2023 Birmingham | 01:37:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
