Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tuck Lee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tuck Lee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tuck Lee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tuck Lee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 05:16 to 04:22 | 36.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:42 | 02:39 to 01:57 | 28.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:05 to 03:24 | 27.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 03:31 to 03:22 | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:02 to 04:01 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:20 to 04:19 | 0.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:11 to 01:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:31 to 33:31 | 0.0% |
| Tuck Lee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 03:53 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 04:30 | 04:09 -00:07 | 03:53 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 03:58 | 08:32 | 04:05 -00:07 | 08:02 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 12:30 | 02:23 +00:16 | 12:07 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:07 | 15:09 | 04:22 -00:15 | 14:30 +00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:05 | 19:16 | 03:45 +00:20 | 18:52 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:03 | 23:21 | 04:22 -00:19 | 22:37 +00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:31 | 27:24 | 03:44 -00:13 | 26:59 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 04:08 | 30:55 | 04:28 -00:20 | 30:43 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:20 | 35:03 | 04:24 -00:04 | 35:11 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 04:13 | 39:23 | 04:23 -00:10 | 39:35 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:11 | 43:36 | 01:44 -00:33 | 43:58 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 04:10 | 44:47 | 04:23 -00:13 | 45:42 -00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:31 | 48:57 | 03:49 -00:18 | 50:05 -01:08 |
| Running 8 | 04:25 | 52:28 | 04:39 -00:14 | 53:54 -01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:16 | 56:53 | 04:48 +00:28 | 58:33 -01:40 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:08:00 | 04:39 +01:18 | 01:08:00 |
Lee Tuck, aged 35-39, from Malaysia, showcased a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, placing 159th overall out of 4107 athletes. His total running time was 00:33:31, which is 01:21 faster than the average, indicating his strong running prowess. Lee had a swift start, with his running times consistently faster than the average, especially in the latter half of the race (Running 4 to 8). This suggests a strategic approach with a good balance of both speed and endurance.
However, his Roxzone time was slower than average, which implies that he took longer periods of rest or transition between exercise zones. Thus, while Lee's running performance is commendable, there is a need for improvement in his overall fitness and transition times.
Lee should consider implementing the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Drake Joe | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:08:26 | |
| Arriola Frank | 2024 Anaheim | 01:07:46 | |
| Gourot Guillaume | 2024 Marseille | 01:07:43 | |
| Smith Lewis | 2024 Singapore | 01:07:31 | |
| Ambert Louis | 2024 Glasgow | 01:08:21 | |
| Küttner Nico | 2024 Hamburg | 01:08:26 | |
| Hearn Simon | 2024 Brisbane | 01:07:34 | |
| Darling Andrew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:07:58 | |
| Hauck Felix | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:07:49 | |
| Micklem James | 2024 London | 01:07:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Hong Kong | 59:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
