Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Nürnberg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Treml Felix's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Treml Felix's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Treml Felix's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Treml Felix's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:23 | 08:31 to 06:08 | 67.1% |
| Run Total | 00:52 | 42:51 to 41:59 | 24.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:14 to 02:04 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:32 to 04:24 | 3.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Treml Felix | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:00 | 04:27 +00:05 | 04:40 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 08:32 | 05:00 -00:07 | 09:07 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 13:25 | 02:56 -00:26 | 14:07 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 15:55 | 05:26 -00:04 | 17:03 -01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 21:17 | 05:00 -00:31 | 22:29 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 25:46 | 05:26 -00:06 | 27:29 -01:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 31:06 | 05:22 -00:35 | 32:55 -01:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 35:53 | 05:36 -00:14 | 38:17 -02:24 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 41:15 | 04:50 -00:14 | 43:53 -02:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 45:51 | 05:29 +00:04 | 48:43 -02:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 51:24 | 02:12 +00:02 | 54:12 -02:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 53:38 | 05:26 +00:01 | 56:24 -02:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 59:05 | 05:08 -00:16 | 01:01:50 -02:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:57 | 01:03:57 | 06:04 +00:53 | 01:06:58 -03:01 |
| Wall Balls | 08:31 | 01:10:54 | 06:35 +01:56 | 01:13:02 -02:08 |
| Roxzone | 07:18 | 01:26:35 | 06:58 +00:20 | 01:26:35 |
Felix's total running time of 00:42:51 is 01:25 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to focus more on improving his running abilities. However, it's important to note that his Best running Lap time of 00:04:00 is quite impressive and indicates that he has the potential to excel in running segments.
In conclusion, Felix Treml displayed a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on specific segments and implementing targeted training strategies, he can enhance his overall performance. Incorporating strength training exercises, improving running technique, and practicing efficient transitions will contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ashworth Chris | 2022 Birmingham | 01:26:32 | |
| Ip Kin Pan | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:26:42 | |
| Guerrini Fabrizio | 2023 Milan | 01:26:44 | |
| Beugre Stéphane | 2022 Basel | 01:26:50 | |
| Heinzle Tim | 2018 Wien | 01:26:27 | |
| Bukiewicz Jon | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:26:17 | |
| Harris Charlie | 2022 London | 01:27:01 | |
| Turkington Lewis | 2023 Glasgow | 01:26:25 | |
| Mcdonald Nick | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:54 | |
| Pabin Paweł | 2024 Poznan | 01:26:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Leipzig | 01:31:03 | |
| 2018 Hamburg | 01:26:33 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:16:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
