Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tremelling Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tremelling Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tremelling Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tremelling Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:14 | 41:39 to 39:25 | 64.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 05:42 to 04:30 | 34.8% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:37 to 04:36 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Tremelling Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:56 | 00:00 | 04:24 +01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 05:56 | 04:22 -00:09 | 04:24 +01:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 10:09 | 04:45 +00:06 | 08:46 +01:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 15:00 | 02:44 -00:25 | 13:31 +01:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 17:19 | 05:08 -00:08 | 16:15 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 22:19 | 04:37 -00:30 | 21:23 +00:56 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 26:26 | 05:07 -00:08 | 26:00 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 31:25 | 04:57 +00:45 | 31:07 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 37:07 | 05:16 -00:07 | 36:04 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 42:16 | 04:41 -00:04 | 41:20 +00:56 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 46:53 | 05:09 +00:00 | 46:01 +00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 52:02 | 02:04 -00:15 | 51:10 +00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 53:51 | 05:07 -00:03 | 53:14 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:41 | 58:55 | 04:46 -01:05 | 58:21 +00:34 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:02:36 | 05:37 -00:04 | 01:03:07 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:08:09 | 06:01 -01:14 | 01:08:44 -00:35 |
| Roxzone | 08:11 | 01:21:00 | 06:15 +01:56 | 01:21:00 |
Matthew Tremelling, a HYROX athlete in the 40-44 age group, put forth a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. The athlete's overall time was 01:21:00, putting him at rank 1018, within the top 24% of 4107 participants. His exceptional performance in segments like Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls helped propel him ahead of many competitors.
Matthew's total running time of 00:41:39, though slower than the average by 00:50, suggests that he has a more strength-focused profile. The athlete's pacing strategy during the race seemed to be inconsistent, as seen in his slower start in Running 1, which was 01:33 slower than average. However, Matthew picked up his pace in subsequent running segments, running faster than the average in segments Running 3 through 8.
Overall, Matthew should consider implementing the following strategies in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hansen Thorsten | 2023 Hamburg | 01:21:03 | |
| Mastropietro Paolo | 2023 Milan | 01:20:57 | |
| Palmer Sam | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:21:01 | |
| Kristiansen Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:43 | |
| Els Darryn | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:36 | |
| Else Dale | 2023 Manchester | 01:20:51 | |
| Van Toledo Paul | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:58 | |
| Dunne Noel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:00 | |
| Pask Julian | 2024 Köln | 01:20:48 | |
| Hardy Sam | 2023 London | 01:20:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
