Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 233 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Terzaki Lhea's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Terzaki Lhea's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Terzaki Lhea's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Terzaki Lhea's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:25 | 06:22 to 04:57 | 60.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:45 | 06:54 to 06:09 | 32.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:42 to 02:36 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:49 to 04:47 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 06:14 to 06:12 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:25 to 40:25 | 0.0% |
| Terzaki Lhea | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 05:01 | 04:48 +00:01 | 04:38 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 09:50 | 04:58 -00:16 | 09:26 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:41 | 14:32 | 03:59 -00:18 | 14:24 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 18:13 | 05:22 -00:23 | 18:23 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 06:14 | 23:12 | 06:30 -00:16 | 23:45 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 29:26 | 05:23 -00:23 | 30:15 -00:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:22 | 34:26 | 05:05 +01:17 | 35:38 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 40:48 | 05:27 -00:21 | 40:43 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 45:54 | 05:04 -00:03 | 46:10 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 50:55 | 05:23 -00:23 | 51:14 -00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 55:55 | 02:43 -00:01 | 56:37 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 58:37 | 05:26 -00:24 | 59:20 -00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 01:03:39 | 05:12 -00:23 | 01:04:46 -01:07 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:08:28 | 05:55 -00:17 | 01:09:58 -01:30 |
| Wall Balls | 06:54 | 01:14:06 | 06:30 +00:24 | 01:15:53 -01:47 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:28:30 | 06:07 +01:31 | 01:28:30 |
Lhea Terzaki's performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX PRO event was commendable. Ranking 88th out of 524 athletes, she secured a position in the top 16% overall. Among her age group, she was ranked 14th, placing her in the top 38%. Her total running time was 02:10 faster than average, indicating her strong running abilities. However, the analysis suggests that she started a bit slower than average in the first running segment, but managed to recover and perform faster than average in the subsequent running segments. This suggests a well-managed pacing strategy.
Her strength appears to be more towards running, as her total running time was notably faster than average. Despite the slower start, she was able to maintain a faster pace throughout the race. This suggests a robust running endurance and efficient recovery between the strength segments. However, her time in the roxzone was slower than average, suggesting some room for improvement in her overall fitness and transition time.
Going forward, Lhea should focus on maintaining a consistent pace from the start, as starting slower can lead to lost time that is hard to recover. She should also consider practicing running under fatigue to better handle the running segments post strength exercises. Incorporating specific strength training targeted at her weaker segments can help improve her overall performance. Finally, practicing efficient transitions between exercises can significantly reduce her Roxzone time, contributing to a faster overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Harding Karen | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:10 | |
| Cilino Erica | 2024 Turin | 01:28:55 | |
| Dijkstra Geraldina | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:58 | |
| Parsons Sam | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:28:27 | |
| 朱 思颖 | 2024 Beijing | 01:28:30 | |
| Barona Giulia | 2024 Turin | 01:28:32 | |
| Firkins Julia | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:08 | |
| Alziary Yolaine | 2024 Turin | 01:28:19 | |
| Wendt Nadine | 2022 Hamburg | 01:28:30 | |
| Foecking Courtney | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:29:07 | |
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:23:48 | |
| 2023 London | 01:29:27 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:22:54 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
