Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ten Houten Tessa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ten Houten Tessa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ten Houten Tessa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ten Houten Tessa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:03 | 49:53 to 47:50 | 52.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:11 | 07:05 to 05:54 | 30.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 03:11 to 02:49 | 9.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:39 to 05:27 | 5.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 06:34 to 06:30 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 05:12 to 05:11 | 0.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Ten Houten Tessa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 05:22 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:12 | 03:57 | 05:14 -00:02 | 05:22 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 09:09 | 05:45 +00:12 | 10:36 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:11 | 15:06 | 02:54 +00:17 | 16:21 -01:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:55 | 18:17 | 06:05 +00:50 | 19:15 -00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 07:05 | 25:12 | 06:10 +00:55 | 25:20 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:49 | 32:17 | 06:05 +00:44 | 31:30 +00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:34 | 39:06 | 06:46 -00:12 | 37:35 +01:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:15 | 45:40 | 06:14 +00:01 | 44:21 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 51:55 | 05:31 +00:08 | 50:35 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 57:34 | 06:08 +00:14 | 56:06 +01:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:03:56 | 02:24 -00:20 | 01:02:14 +01:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:06:00 | 06:06 +00:20 | 01:04:38 +01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 01:12:26 | 05:12 -00:57 | 01:10:44 +01:42 |
| Running 8 | 07:16 | 01:16:41 | 06:39 +00:37 | 01:15:56 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 04:55 | 01:23:57 | 05:31 -00:36 | 01:22:35 +01:22 |
| Roxzone | 07:00 | 01:35:42 | 07:36 -00:36 | 01:35:42 |
Pacing:
Tessa's pacing throughout the race seems to be consistent, with only a few segments where she lost significant time compared to the average. Overall, her pacing was neither too fast nor too slow, indicating good endurance and race management.
Profile:
Tessa's total running time of 00:49:53 is 02:25 slower than the average, suggesting that she can focus on improving her running performance. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:03:57 was 01:12 faster than the average, indicating that she has the potential to excel in running segments.
By implementing these strategies and following the specific training recommendations provided for the identified areas of improvement, Tessa can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Séne Nafi | 2024 Marseille | 01:36:04 | |
| Mayanmartinez Monica | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:35:14 | |
| Hofsäss Julia Noelle | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:35:38 | |
| Green Kimberly | 2023 London | 01:35:45 | |
| Krivohlavek Nina | 2023 Hannover | 01:35:19 | |
| Bright Robyn | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:20 | |
| Williams Charlotte | 2024 London | 01:35:34 | |
| Mora Tania | 2023 Milan | 01:35:48 | |
| Kennedy Vicki | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:43 | |
| Gaitan Angelica | 2024 Paris | 01:35:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:39:09 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:22 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:39:55 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
