Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Shefferd Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Shefferd Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Shefferd Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Shefferd Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:52 | 05:36 to 03:44 | 47.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 05:46 to 04:42 | 27.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:30 to 01:56 | 14.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 05:04 to 04:49 | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:13 to 05:03 | 4.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:02 to 04:00 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:34 to 40:34 | 0.0% |
| Shefferd Amy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:32 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 05:32 | 04:58 +00:06 | 04:46 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 10:36 | 05:07 -00:22 | 09:44 +00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 15:21 | 02:32 -00:21 | 14:51 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 17:32 | 05:22 -00:19 | 17:23 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 22:35 | 05:12 +00:34 | 22:45 -00:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 28:21 | 05:23 -00:28 | 27:57 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 33:16 | 05:19 -00:35 | 33:20 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 38:00 | 05:30 -00:23 | 38:39 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 43:07 | 05:12 +00:01 | 44:09 -01:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 48:20 | 05:25 -00:12 | 49:21 -01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 53:33 | 02:07 +00:23 | 54:46 -01:13 |
| Running 7 | 04:51 | 56:03 | 05:24 -00:33 | 56:53 -00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:02 | 01:00:54 | 04:18 -00:16 | 01:02:17 -01:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:12 | 01:04:56 | 05:45 -00:33 | 01:06:35 -01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:10:08 | 04:18 +01:18 | 01:12:20 -02:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:22:38 | 06:00 +01:05 | 01:22:38 |
Amy Shefferd showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Finishing in the top 6% of 4107 athletes overall and top 10% in her age group, Amy demonstrated strength in both running and strength segments. Her total running time was notably impressive, finishing 02:26 faster than the average time. However, her performance in the roxzone suggests a need for better transition time management and overall fitness improvement.
During the race, Amy displayed a strong start but then lost some momentum in the middle segments. She then picked up the pace towards the end indicating a strong finishing kick. Her performance suggests a hybrid profile, excelling both at running and strength segments.
For future races, Amy should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jättner Linda | 2024 Stockholm | 01:23:05 | |
| Lawn Helena | 2023 Birmingham | 01:22:39 | |
| Duffy Sarah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:19 | |
| Nogan Erika | 2023 New York | 01:22:37 | |
| Van Lienden Vanessa | 2023 Köln | 01:22:30 | |
| Zsigmond Cristiana | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:59 | |
| Reabteva Olga | 2024 Turin | 01:22:09 | |
| Le Gall Jessica | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:20 | |
| Hoskings Joanne | 2023 Bilbao | 01:22:32 | |
| El Turk Amany | 2024 Dubai | 01:22:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
