Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 108 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sheehy Leanne's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sheehy Leanne's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sheehy Leanne's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sheehy Leanne's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 05:14 to 04:10 | 37.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:54 | 03:27 to 02:33 | 31.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 04:40 to 04:15 | 14.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 03:37 to 03:20 | 9.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:28 to 04:21 | 4.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:51 to 01:47 | 2.3% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:30 to 33:30 | 0.0% |
| Sheehy Leanne | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 03:49 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:30 | 04:25 +00:03 | 03:49 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 03:48 | 08:58 | 04:04 -00:16 | 08:14 +00:44 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 12:46 | 03:03 +00:24 | 12:18 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 04:21 | 16:13 | 04:18 +00:03 | 15:21 +00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 20:34 | 04:32 +00:08 | 19:39 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 04:09 | 25:14 | 04:20 -00:11 | 24:11 +01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:37 | 29:23 | 03:39 -00:02 | 28:31 +00:52 |
| Running 5 | 04:14 | 33:00 | 04:25 -00:11 | 32:10 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 37:14 | 04:35 -00:05 | 36:35 +00:39 |
| Running 6 | 04:06 | 41:44 | 04:22 -00:16 | 41:10 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 45:50 | 01:57 -00:06 | 45:32 +00:18 |
| Running 7 | 04:09 | 47:41 | 04:24 -00:15 | 47:29 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:59 | 51:50 | 03:48 -00:49 | 51:53 -00:03 |
| Running 8 | 04:17 | 54:49 | 04:36 -00:19 | 55:41 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 59:06 | 04:31 +00:43 | 01:00:17 -01:11 |
| Roxzone | 04:58 | 01:09:10 | 04:22 +00:36 | 01:09:10 |
Leanne Sheehy put up a strong performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the Top 1% of all athletes and finishing 3rd overall. Her total running time was faster than average by 01:04, indicating a strong running profile. However, her Roxzone performance was slower than average, suggesting that transitions and rest periods could be improved. Despite a slower start in Running 1, she demonstrated strong pacing, generally speeding up in subsequent running segments.
Leanne should implement the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Röthig Sabrina | 2023 Hannover | 01:09:38 | |
| Hatwell Bekkie | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:09:07 | |
| Stevenson Connie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:09:23 | |
| Arvela Petra | 2023 Hannover | 01:08:51 | |
| Bent Sinéad | 2024 Milan | 01:09:11 | |
| Wopat Carly | 2023 Chicago | 01:08:50 | |
| Greenlee Alandra | 2023 New York | 01:09:28 | |
| Middlemast Amy | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:09:38 | |
| Ardelt Beatrice | 2022 Bremen | 01:09:30 | |
| Silva Carolina | 2023 Köln | 01:08:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:08:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
