Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rowlands David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rowlands David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rowlands David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rowlands David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 00:54 | 40:51 to 39:57 | 40.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:17 to 01:56 | 15.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 05:54 to 05:37 | 12.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 04:37 to 04:21 | 12.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 04:49 to 04:37 | 9.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:43 to 02:32 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:39 to 04:38 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowlands David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 04:29 +01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:42 | 04:23 -00:08 | 04:29 +01:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 09:57 | 04:47 -00:18 | 08:52 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 14:26 | 02:46 -00:03 | 13:39 +00:47 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 17:09 | 05:12 -00:49 | 16:25 +00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 21:32 | 04:40 -00:03 | 21:37 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 26:09 | 05:09 -00:22 | 26:17 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 30:56 | 04:58 -00:09 | 31:26 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 35:45 | 05:19 -00:05 | 36:24 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 40:59 | 04:44 -00:05 | 41:43 -00:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 45:38 | 05:12 +00:38 | 46:27 -00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 51:28 | 02:06 +00:11 | 51:39 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 53:45 | 05:10 +00:02 | 53:45 +00:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:04 | 58:57 | 04:50 -01:46 | 58:55 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:02:01 | 05:42 -00:24 | 01:03:45 -01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:07:19 | 06:07 -00:13 | 01:09:27 -02:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:21:55 | 06:21 +02:29 | 01:21:55 |
David Rowlands demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, securing himself a position in the top 26% of all athletes and the top 24% for his age group (40-44). From the analysis, it appears that David leans towards a runner profile, as evidenced by his total running time being faster than average. His running performance was generally strong, with all running splits, apart from Running 1 and Running 6, clocking in faster than the average.
David's pacing strategy might be an area to revisit. He started slower with the Running 1 being 01:13 slower than average, which might have been a strategic decision to conserve energy. However, his pace in the later segments was generally above average. This suggests that there's room for optimization in how he allocates his energy throughout the race.
There are several segments that David could focus on improving:
David should consider tweaking his race strategy to maximize his performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevan Lewis | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:42 | |
| Bielchen Christian | 2023 München | 01:21:41 | |
| Pleus Stefan | 2022 Bremen | 01:22:17 | |
| Casagrande Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:22:11 | |
| Avognan Cyr | 2024 Paris | 01:22:19 | |
| Taylor Rob | 2024 Turin | 01:22:00 | |
| Leeson Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:30 | |
| Harvey Ant | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:53 | |
| Affre Julien | 2024 Marseille | 01:21:52 | |
| Abraham Glen | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
