Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rogers James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rogers James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rogers James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rogers James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 04:23 to 03:34 | 32.0% |
| Run Total | 00:40 | 35:53 to 35:13 | 26.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 03:59 to 03:35 | 15.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 03:56 to 03:44 | 7.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:14 to 02:03 | 7.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:13 to 04:04 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 01:45 to 01:37 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Rogers James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:02 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:42 | 04:13 +00:00 | 04:02 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:07 | 08:55 | 04:21 -00:14 | 08:15 +00:40 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 13:02 | 02:27 -00:13 | 12:36 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 04:22 | 15:16 | 04:39 -00:17 | 15:03 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 19:38 | 04:01 +00:22 | 19:42 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 24:01 | 04:37 +00:02 | 23:43 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:59 | 28:40 | 04:07 -00:08 | 28:20 +00:20 |
| Running 5 | 04:31 | 32:39 | 04:45 -00:14 | 32:27 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 37:10 | 04:30 -00:08 | 37:12 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 04:23 | 41:32 | 04:39 -00:16 | 41:42 -00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 45:55 | 01:49 -00:04 | 46:21 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 04:22 | 47:40 | 04:37 -00:15 | 48:10 -00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 52:02 | 04:07 -00:11 | 52:47 -00:45 |
| Running 8 | 04:50 | 55:58 | 05:00 -00:10 | 56:54 -00:56 |
| Wall Balls | 04:28 | 01:00:48 | 05:11 -00:43 | 01:01:54 -01:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:06 | 01:12:15 | 05:10 +01:56 | 01:12:15 |
James Rogers demonstrated an exceptional performance in the 2024 Birmingham event, achieving an overall rank of 362 amongst 4107 athletes. He finished within the top 8%, and ranked 92 in his age group of 30-34 years, placing him within the top 11% of 813 athletes. His total running time of 00:35:53 was faster than the average by 01:02, indicating a strong running profile. However, his start was relatively slow with Running 1 being 00:40 slower than average, but he managed to pick up the pace in the subsequent running segments, consistently beating the average time.
Considering James' strong running profile, it would be beneficial to maintain a steady pace from the start rather than starting slow and picking up speed later. This would prevent unnecessary energy expenditure in the later stages of the race. Additionally, focusing on quick transitions between different exercises can help reduce the roxzone time, thus improving the overall time. It's also crucial to incorporate regular rest and recovery periods in the training schedule to prevent overtraining and injuries. Lastly, good nutrition and hydration before and during the race can significantly enhance performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SaintLeger Yohan | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:12:41 | |
| Schmitz Andreas | 2024 Köln | 01:12:06 | |
| Simon Peter | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:12:15 | |
| Corbett John | 2024 Dubai | 01:12:08 | |
| Seetsen Joey | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:12:28 | |
| Grimes Rory | 2022 Birmingham | 01:12:27 | |
| Rindos Justin | 2023 Chicago | 01:12:29 | |
| Staff Ethan | 2024 London | 01:12:40 | |
| Quinn Coaran | 2023 Dublin | 01:11:47 | |
| Pierce Zac | 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
