Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peterson James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peterson James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peterson James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peterson James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:01 | 43:00 to 40:59 | 49.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:53 | 05:43 to 04:50 | 21.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 05:13 to 04:42 | 12.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 04:50 to 04:31 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:32 to 04:21 | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:46 to 02:38 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:45 to 04:42 | 1.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Peterson James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:41 | 04:24 +00:08 | 04:33 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 09:13 | 04:53 -00:12 | 08:57 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 13:54 | 02:52 -00:06 | 13:50 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 16:40 | 05:18 +00:26 | 16:42 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 22:24 | 04:49 +00:01 | 22:00 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 27:14 | 05:16 +00:23 | 26:49 +00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 32:53 | 05:08 +00:35 | 32:05 +00:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 38:36 | 05:26 +00:00 | 37:13 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 44:02 | 04:46 -00:01 | 42:39 +01:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 48:47 | 05:18 -00:01 | 47:25 +01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 54:04 | 02:09 -00:27 | 52:43 +01:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 55:46 | 05:17 +00:08 | 54:52 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:13 | 01:01:11 | 04:58 +00:15 | 01:00:09 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 01:06:24 | 05:51 +00:20 | 01:05:07 +01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:12:35 | 06:16 -00:46 | 01:10:58 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 01:23:51 | 06:37 -00:41 | 01:23:51 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that James struggled the most in the following segments: Run Total, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 3, Best Lap, Running 4, Sandbag Lunges, Running 1, Ski Erg, and Running 8. These segments accounted for the majority of time lost during the race.
In conclusion, James Peterson performed well in the HYROX race in London, but there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving overall fitness, refining running form and technique, and developing strength and power, James can improve his performance in the identified segments. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, minimizing transition time, and prioritizing strength and running training will also contribute to better overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Binnings David | 2021 Dallas | 01:23:59 | |
| Bakkoury Ayoub | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:52 | |
| Brett Reece | 2023 London | 01:23:25 | |
| Otterbein Florian | 2024 Köln | 01:23:52 | |
| Zipkowitz Matt | 2024 Dallas | 01:23:59 | |
| Bolten Toon | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:56 | |
| Weber Phillip | 2024 Köln | 01:23:46 | |
| Cabannes Landry | 2024 Bilbao | 01:24:18 | |
| Albert Remi | 2023 Paris | 01:23:57 | |
| Singleton Paul | 2024 Malaga | 01:23:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:25:34 | |
| 2023 London | 01:19:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
