Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peters Lewis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peters Lewis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peters Lewis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peters Lewis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:58 | 40:53 to 37:55 | 57.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 04:39 to 04:00 | 12.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 04:46 to 04:09 | 11.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 05:38 to 05:09 | 9.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:30 to 04:10 | 6.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 01:56 to 01:48 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Peters Lewis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:40 | 04:19 -00:08 | 04:18 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 07:51 | 04:36 +00:25 | 08:37 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 12:52 | 02:38 -00:37 | 13:13 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 14:53 | 04:59 +00:22 | 15:51 -00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 20:14 | 04:24 +00:15 | 20:50 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 24:53 | 04:58 +00:25 | 25:14 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 30:16 | 04:36 +00:10 | 30:12 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 35:02 | 05:06 +00:18 | 34:48 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 40:26 | 04:38 -00:09 | 39:54 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 44:55 | 04:59 +00:20 | 44:32 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 50:14 | 01:59 -00:03 | 49:31 +00:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 52:10 | 04:58 +00:17 | 51:30 +00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:30 | 57:25 | 04:32 -00:02 | 56:28 +00:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:01:55 | 05:25 +00:08 | 01:01:00 +00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:07:28 | 05:42 -00:04 | 01:06:25 +01:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:01 | 01:18:00 | 05:53 -00:52 | 01:18:00 |
Lewis Peters showcased a strong performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, finishing within the top 40% of all athletes and the top 44% of his age group. However, there are areas where Lewis can improve to boost his overall ranking and performance. His total running time was 01:23 slower than the average, indicating that his strength lies more in strength-based exercises rather than running. He also started off the race incredibly fast, with his first running segment being 00:38 faster than the average. However, this quick start may have led to a slower pace in the later segments of the race.
During the race, Lewis should aim to start at a more controlled pace. This will help him conserve energy for the later stages of the race, potentially improving his overall time. He should also focus on efficient transitions between segments to minimize rest time and keep his momentum going. Given his strength in strength-based exercises, he could aim to make up time in these segments to offset his slower running times. Additionally, focusing on proper form during the exercises can help prevent injury and improve efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Connolly Dean | 2022 Manchester | 01:17:53 | |
| Falke Aaron | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:17:39 | |
| Sully Matthew | 2024 Perth | 01:17:36 | |
| Kowalski Mariusz | 2024 Katowice | 01:18:20 | |
| Paxman Jody | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:49 | |
| Del Zotto Daniele | 2024 Rimini | 01:18:06 | |
| Sek Wojciech | 2024 Poznan | 01:17:43 | |
| Walker Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:12 | |
| Koßler Nico | 2021 Hamburg | 01:18:10 | |
| Gohl Jesus Gustavo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:17:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:27:26 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
