Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Möller Mt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Möller Mt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Möller Mt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Möller Mt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:54 | 42:49 to 37:55 | 77.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:33 | 05:42 to 05:09 | 8.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:14 to 01:48 | 6.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 04:33 to 04:09 | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:33 to 04:31 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Möller Mt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:30 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 03:30 | 04:19 -00:16 | 04:18 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 06:09 | 07:33 | 04:36 +01:33 | 08:37 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 13:42 | 02:39 -00:44 | 13:13 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 15:37 | 04:59 -00:15 | 15:52 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 03:28 | 20:21 | 04:24 -00:56 | 20:51 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 23:49 | 04:57 +00:22 | 25:15 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 29:08 | 04:36 -00:03 | 30:12 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 33:41 | 05:06 +00:40 | 34:48 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 39:27 | 04:38 -00:05 | 39:54 -00:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 44:00 | 04:59 +00:30 | 44:32 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 49:29 | 01:59 +00:15 | 49:31 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 51:43 | 04:58 +00:43 | 51:30 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:13 | 57:24 | 04:32 -01:19 | 56:28 +00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:00:37 | 05:25 +00:50 | 01:01:00 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:42 | 01:06:52 | 05:42 +00:00 | 01:06:25 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:17:59 | 05:52 -00:18 | 01:17:59 |
Mt Möller delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 18% of all competitors and top 22% in his age group. Notably, he performed exceptionally well in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges, indicating a robust strength profile. However, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in running efficiency. His pacing strategy showed a strong start in Running 1 but a noticeable slowdown in latter segments, indicating possible fatigue or energy management issues.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hopp Tim | 2024 Cape Town | 01:17:37 | |
| Devulder Kévin | 2024 Paris | 01:18:20 | |
| Zbaeda Monder | 2023 London | 01:18:10 | |
| Finnegan Colin | 2024 Köln | 01:18:07 | |
| Boswell Jonathan | 2023 London | 01:18:20 | |
| Schilling Wolfgang | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:12 | |
| Fuller Jonathan | 2024 Dallas | 01:17:44 | |
| Mcgregor Taylor | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:53 | |
| Zilligers Markus | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:17:39 | |
| Mcguigan Stephen Patrick | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
