Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mears Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mears Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mears Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mears Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:53 | 07:51 to 05:58 | 61.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 05:40 to 04:46 | 29.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:07 to 04:55 | 6.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:42 to 02:40 | 1.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:45 to 04:43 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:48 to 40:48 | 0.0% |
| Mears Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:28 | 04:25 -00:16 | 04:35 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 09:37 | 04:55 -00:15 | 09:00 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:17 | 02:51 -00:09 | 13:55 +00:22 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 16:59 | 05:21 -00:27 | 16:46 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 21:53 | 04:51 -00:42 | 22:07 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:02 | 05:20 -00:15 | 26:58 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 31:07 | 05:15 -00:08 | 32:18 -01:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 36:14 | 05:30 -00:20 | 37:33 -01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 41:24 | 04:47 -00:02 | 43:03 -01:39 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 46:09 | 05:21 -00:23 | 47:50 -01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 51:07 | 02:09 -00:11 | 53:11 -02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 53:05 | 05:21 -00:16 | 55:20 -02:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 58:10 | 05:02 +00:38 | 01:00:41 -02:31 |
| Running 8 | 05:31 | 01:03:50 | 05:56 -00:25 | 01:05:43 -01:53 |
| Wall Balls | 07:51 | 01:09:21 | 06:25 +01:26 | 01:11:39 -02:18 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:24:47 | 06:43 +00:59 | 01:24:47 |
Luke Mears delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox event, finishing in the top 31% of all athletes and the top 37% of his age group. Particularly noteworthy is his total running time of 00:40:48, which is 01:46 faster than the average. This suggests that Luke has a strong runner's profile, able to maintain fast pace over the course of the race. However, there are certain areas in which he lost time, notably in the roxzone, where he was slower than average, indicating a need for better transition time and overall fitness improvement.
Given Luke's strengths as a runner, he should leverage this advantage by maintaining a fast pace during the running segments. However, it's also crucial not to start too fast to avoid burnout in the later stages of the race. Furthermore, focusing on efficient transitions between exercises can help save valuable time. Practicing these transitions during training can help make them second nature come race day. Finally, a focus on recovery and hydration strategies during the race can help maintain performance levels throughout.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Dam Rick | 2023 Barcelona | 01:24:34 | |
| Turbitt Niall | 2024 London | 01:25:13 | |
| Giles David | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:30 | |
| Lewis James | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:38 | |
| Thompson James | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:29 | |
| OConnor Caolan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:58 | |
| Eskey Joe | 2023 Dallas | 01:24:24 | |
| Ehlers Roy | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:24:28 | |
| Pilling Sebastian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:32 | |
| Angehrn Oliver | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:24:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Manchester | 01:36:31 | |
| 2022 London | 01:36:27 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:30:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
