Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 351 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcfarlane Amber's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcfarlane Amber's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcfarlane Amber's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcfarlane Amber's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:17 | 10:22 to 07:05 | 52.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:03 | 10:38 to 08:35 | 33.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:53 | 07:15 to 06:22 | 14.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 55:21 to 55:21 | 0.0% |
| Mcfarlane Amber | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:42 | 00:00 | 06:02 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 06:42 | 05:30 -00:45 | 06:02 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 06:38 | 11:27 | 06:37 +00:01 | 11:32 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 18:05 | 03:29 -00:46 | 18:09 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 20:48 | 07:04 -00:34 | 21:38 -00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 06:11 | 27:18 | 07:39 -01:28 | 28:42 -01:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 33:29 | 07:07 -00:38 | 36:21 -02:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:38 | 39:58 | 08:56 +01:42 | 43:28 -03:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:50 | 50:36 | 07:24 -00:34 | 52:24 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 57:26 | 05:55 -00:47 | 59:48 -02:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 01:02:34 | 07:17 -00:25 | 01:05:43 -03:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 01:09:26 | 02:45 -00:35 | 01:13:00 -03:34 |
| Running 7 | 06:55 | 01:11:36 | 07:19 -00:24 | 01:15:45 -04:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:15 | 01:18:31 | 06:36 +00:39 | 01:23:04 -04:33 |
| Running 8 | 08:29 | 01:25:46 | 08:13 +00:16 | 01:29:40 -03:54 |
| Wall Balls | 10:22 | 01:34:15 | 07:14 +03:08 | 01:37:53 -03:38 |
| Roxzone | 10:21 | 01:54:50 | 09:43 +00:38 | 01:54:50 |
Amber Mcfarlane displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox event. Being in the top 29% overall and the top 43% in her age group is a significant accomplishment. Her total running time was notably faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Amber's performance had a strong start in the initial segments, but her pacing seemed to falter at later stages of the race, particularly during the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls. Despite this, her strength-based exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull outperformed the average, showcasing a balanced hybrid profile.
For future races, Amber could implement several strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis Chloe | 2024 Glasgow | 01:54:30 | |
| Tossoun Amy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:55:09 | |
| Mcphee Laura | 2023 Birmingham | 01:55:09 | |
| Watts Sarah | 2024 Manchester | 01:54:29 | |
| Gomes Sanches Sheila | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:54:51 | |
| Kelleher Claire T | 2024 Malaga | 01:54:53 | |
| Wordingham Sara | 2024 Katowice | 01:54:36 | |
| Tan Yiwen | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:44 | |
| Ghijsen Floor | 2024 Paris | 01:55:06 | |
| Prince Koyel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:54:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:40:55 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:04 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:41:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
