Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 218 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lowes Elvira's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lowes Elvira's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lowes Elvira's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lowes Elvira's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:46 | 05:36 to 04:50 | 31.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:43 | 05:37 to 04:54 | 29.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 03:22 to 03:00 | 15.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:23 to 02:02 | 14.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:37 to 04:30 | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:47 to 04:43 | 2.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 03:56 to 03:53 | 2.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:25 to 36:25 | 0.0% |
| Lowes Elvira | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 04:13 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:04 | 04:36 +00:01 | 04:13 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:07 | 09:41 | 04:28 -00:21 | 08:49 +00:52 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 13:48 | 03:24 -00:02 | 13:17 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:32 | 17:10 | 04:46 -00:14 | 16:41 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:37 | 21:42 | 05:22 +00:15 | 21:27 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 04:33 | 27:19 | 04:50 -00:17 | 26:49 +00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:56 | 31:52 | 04:16 -00:20 | 31:39 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 04:32 | 35:48 | 04:52 -00:20 | 35:55 -00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 40:20 | 04:48 -00:01 | 40:47 -00:27 |
| Running 6 | 04:27 | 45:07 | 04:49 -00:22 | 45:35 -00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 49:34 | 02:15 +00:08 | 50:24 -00:50 |
| Running 7 | 04:36 | 51:57 | 04:51 -00:15 | 52:39 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:06 | 56:33 | 04:23 -00:17 | 57:30 -00:57 |
| Running 8 | 04:39 | 01:00:39 | 05:04 -00:25 | 01:01:53 -01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:05:18 | 05:19 +00:17 | 01:06:57 -01:39 |
| Roxzone | 06:33 | 01:17:19 | 05:03 +01:30 | 01:17:19 |
Elvira Lowes demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX Pro race, placing in the top 5% of all athletes and ranking 3rd in her age group. She has a distinct runner profile, as evidenced by her total running time being 01:35 faster than the average. Despite a slower start in the first running segment, she consistently improved on her running time in the subsequent segments, showcasing excellent pacing and endurance. However, her roxzone time was slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in transitions and overall fitness.
Elvira should consider implementing the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Düthorn Antje | 2024 Hamburg | 01:17:47 | |
| Haysom Kirsten | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:11 | |
| Rowland Gemma | 2024 Manchester | 01:16:59 | |
| Rosa Ilaria | 2023 Rimini | 01:17:27 | |
| Conti Federica | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:35 | |
| Weiser Julie | 2024 Dallas | 01:17:15 | |
| Lincoln Stine | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:17:01 | |
| Jakeman Ingrid | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:48 | |
| Taylor Lyndsey | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:50 | |
| KopczakChudzio Ewa | 2024 Katowice | 01:17:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:15:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
