Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 540 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lowe Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lowe Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lowe Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lowe Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:21 | 07:25 to 05:04 | 75.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 04:21 to 03:35 | 24.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:20 to 35:20 | 0.0% |
| Lowe Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:17 | 00:00 | 03:57 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 04:17 | 04:07 -00:05 | 03:57 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 03:50 | 08:19 | 04:17 -00:27 | 08:04 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 12:09 | 03:26 -00:24 | 12:21 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 15:11 | 04:39 -00:16 | 15:47 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 07:25 | 19:34 | 05:32 +01:53 | 20:26 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 04:26 | 26:59 | 04:40 -00:14 | 25:58 +01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 31:25 | 03:58 +00:23 | 30:38 +00:47 |
| Running 5 | 04:34 | 35:46 | 04:44 -00:10 | 34:36 +01:10 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 40:20 | 04:24 -00:08 | 39:20 +01:00 |
| Running 6 | 04:17 | 44:36 | 04:39 -00:22 | 43:44 +00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 48:53 | 02:02 -00:25 | 48:23 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 04:38 | 50:30 | 04:43 -00:05 | 50:25 +00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 55:08 | 04:37 -00:39 | 55:08 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 59:06 | 05:05 -00:07 | 59:45 -00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:04:04 | 06:10 -00:41 | 01:04:50 -00:46 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:16:12 | 05:12 +01:34 | 01:16:12 |
Nick Lowe showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX Pro race, ranking in the top 22% of all athletes. His overall time was 01:16:12, with a total running time of 00:35:20, which was 01:29 faster than the average. This indicates that Nick has a strong running profile, which is a testament to his stamina and agility. His fastest running lap was clocked at 00:03:50, again underlining his exceptional running abilities. However, there is a noticeable inconsistency in his pacing, particularly in the initial stages of the race where he started slower than average. His performance in the Roxzone segment suggests that he might be taking too much rest or transition time, which could be improved.
Nick could consider implementing the following strategies in his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lampel Daniel | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:15:47 | |
| Lopez Mickael | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:26 | |
| Bousleiman Anthony | 2023 Dubai | 01:16:18 | |
| Quadarella Matteo | 2023 Barcelona | 01:16:29 | |
| Blasius Steffen | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:16:04 | |
| Brackman Mathieu | 2024 Maastricht | 01:16:27 | |
| Thiem Sebastian | World Championships | 01:16:36 | |
| Port Matthew | 2023 London | 01:16:36 | |
| Vander Veen Daniel | 2023 New York | 01:16:34 | |
| Lowe Nick | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:41:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
