Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 935 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Lancaster Paul's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Lancaster Paul hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Lancaster Paul’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lancaster Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:17 | 04:46 to 03:29 | 34.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:04 | 04:20 to 03:16 | 28.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 02:37 to 01:54 | 19.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 04:41 to 04:17 | 10.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:05 to 04:00 | 2.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 03:26 to 03:21 | 2.2% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:22 to 04:17 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:27 to 01:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 31:50 to 31:50 | 0.0% |
| Lancaster Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:17 | 00:00 | 03:47 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 04:17 | 04:07 -00:02 | 03:47 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 03:35 | 08:22 | 04:03 -00:28 | 07:54 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 11:57 | 02:21 +00:16 | 11:57 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 03:49 | 14:34 | 04:19 -00:30 | 14:18 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 18:23 | 03:41 -00:15 | 18:37 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 03:57 | 21:49 | 04:18 -00:21 | 22:18 -00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:20 | 25:46 | 03:36 +00:44 | 26:36 -00:50 |
| Running 5 | 04:03 | 30:06 | 04:24 -00:21 | 30:12 -00:06 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 34:09 | 04:22 +00:00 | 34:36 -00:27 |
| Running 6 | 03:59 | 38:31 | 04:20 -00:21 | 38:58 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:27 | 42:30 | 01:43 -00:16 | 43:18 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 03:58 | 43:57 | 04:19 -00:21 | 45:01 -01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 47:55 | 03:46 +01:00 | 49:20 -01:25 |
| Running 8 | 04:14 | 52:41 | 04:35 -00:21 | 53:06 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 04:41 | 56:55 | 04:41 +00:00 | 57:41 -00:46 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:06:53 | 04:31 +00:53 | 01:06:53 |
Paul Lancaster's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race was commendable. Ranking 129th out of 4107 competitors and 4th in his age group, Paul demonstrated both fitness and competitive edge. A striking feature of his performance was his total running time, which was faster than the average by 2 minutes and 28 seconds, revealing a strong running profile. However, his performance in the roxzone was slower by 1 minute and 1 second, indicating a need for improvement in transitions and overall fitness. His pacing seemed to improve as the race progressed, with the first running segment being slower than average and subsequent ones being faster. This suggests that Paul could benefit from working on his race start strategy to prevent starting too slow.
Paul should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Feller Daniel | 2023 Hamburg | 01:06:35 | |
| De La Peña Jiménez Luis | 2024 Bilbao | 01:06:47 | |
| Jissink Klaas Sybrand | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:07:17 | |
| Nnoke Eke | 2024 Bilbao | 01:06:57 | |
| Fierro Todd | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:07:05 | |
| Silva Ivan | 2024 Madrid | 01:06:50 | |
| Macaulay Scott | 2024 Gdansk | 01:06:38 | |
| Faulds Scott | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:06:29 | |
| Cook Josh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:06:28 | |
| Arcous Théo | 2024 Paris | 01:06:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:13:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
