Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
30 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 30 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 30 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Kular Harps's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Kular Harps hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 30 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Kular Harps’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kular Harps's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
16:39.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 30 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Harps Kular's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race demonstrates a commendable overall rank, placing in the top 33% of all athletes and top 32% within his age group. A focal point of his success is undoubtedly his running, as his total running time is 06:10 faster than the average. This suggests a strong runner profile, which he utilized to his advantage throughout the race. Despite a slightly slower start in the first running segment, Harps improved his pacing and consistently performed above average in subsequent running segments. His strength in running was particularly apparent in segments 3, 5, and 6, where he maintained a pace 01:05 to 01:11 faster than the average. His roxzone time was also 00:37 faster than average, suggesting efficient transitions and good overall fitness.
Segments to Improve:
Despite his strengths, there are several areas where Harps can focus on for improvement. Specific segments that indicate room for enhancement include Wall Balls, Sled Pull, Sled Push, and Rowing. These tasks often require strength and endurance, suggesting that incorporating strength training exercises into his routine may yield significant benefits.
Wall Balls: With a time of 07:55 slower than the average, this segment requires the most improvement. Harps could benefit from incorporating exercises such as squats, kettlebell swings, and medicine ball throws to increase his explosive power and endurance.
Sled Pull and Sled Push: These segments were slower than average by 01:59 and 00:55 respectively. Training with resistance bands or weighted sleds could help improve strength and technique in these areas.
Rowing: A slower time in this segment by 00:20 suggests room for improvement. Harps could focus on improving his rowing technique and incorporate exercises that strengthen the core and upper body, such as upright rows or deadlifts.
Race Strategies:
To optimize his race performance, Harps could benefit from implementing several strategies. Firstly, pacing during the initial running segment can be improved. Starting slightly faster could help gain an early lead and establish a more balanced pace throughout the race. Secondly, focusing on strength training could help improve performance in strength-based segments and lead to better overall race times. Finally, practicing transitions between different segments could help reduce the roxzone time further and increase overall efficiency.