Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 401 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Kelbrick Jack's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Kelbrick Jack hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Kelbrick Jack’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kelbrick Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 02:30 to 01:42 | 39.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 03:26 to 03:03 | 19.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:23 | 03:18 to 02:55 | 19.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 01:36 to 01:26 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:19 to 04:11 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:01 to 03:54 | 5.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 03:13 to 03:11 | 1.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 31:55 to 31:55 | 0.0% |
| Kelbrick Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 03:39 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 04:07 | 04:03 -00:02 | 03:39 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 03:37 | 08:08 | 03:52 -00:15 | 07:42 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 11:45 | 02:14 +00:16 | 11:34 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 03:53 | 14:15 | 04:04 -00:11 | 13:48 +00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 18:08 | 03:24 +00:02 | 17:52 +00:16 |
| Running 4 | 04:00 | 21:34 | 04:05 -00:05 | 21:16 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:18 | 25:34 | 03:17 +00:01 | 25:21 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 04:05 | 28:52 | 04:10 -00:05 | 28:38 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:19 | 32:57 | 04:17 +00:02 | 32:48 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 03:58 | 37:16 | 04:06 -00:08 | 37:05 +00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 41:14 | 01:36 +00:00 | 41:11 +00:03 |
| Running 7 | 04:04 | 42:50 | 04:06 -00:02 | 42:47 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:13 | 46:54 | 03:25 -00:12 | 46:53 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 04:14 | 50:07 | 04:21 -00:07 | 50:18 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 03:47 | 54:21 | 04:17 -00:30 | 54:39 -00:18 |
| Roxzone | 05:03 | 01:03:05 | 04:09 +00:54 | 01:03:05 |
Jack Kelbrick's performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race was commendable. Placing 37th overall and 9th in his age group out of thousands of competitors is a testament to his athleticism and endurance. Noteworthy was his total running time which was 44 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his roxzone time of 5:03 was slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in transition times and overall fitness. His performance in the initial running segments suggested a slow start, but he picked up pace as the race progressed. Overall, Jack demonstrated a strong balance between strength and running, with a slight edge in running.
For future races, Jack should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spaans Steven | 2022 Maastricht | 01:02:39 | |
| Rice Mitchell | 2024 Birmingham | 01:03:14 | |
| Hall Martyn | 2024 Berlin | 01:03:19 | |
| Babák Josef | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:03:24 | |
| Barreto Nuno | 2023 London | 01:02:37 | |
| Boyle Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:03:19 | |
| Klos Johannes | 2024 Berlin | 01:03:18 | |
| Britto Vincent | 2024 Marseille | 01:02:46 | |
| Rice Mitchell | 2024 Stockholm | 01:02:40 | |
| Olivier Fernandez | 2023 Madrid | 01:03:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:02:48 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:09:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
