Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kavanagh Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kavanagh Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kavanagh Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kavanagh Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:52 | 05:07 to 04:15 | 27.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 06:22 to 05:30 | 27.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:21 to 01:54 | 14.4% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 04:56 to 04:36 | 10.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:46 to 04:26 | 10.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 04:39 to 04:30 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:22 to 04:16 | 3.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:30 to 02:28 | 1.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:32 to 38:32 | 0.0% |
| Kavanagh Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:22 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:42 | 04:21 +00:01 | 04:22 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:09 | 09:04 | 04:44 -00:35 | 08:43 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 13:13 | 02:44 -00:14 | 13:27 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 04:34 | 15:43 | 05:07 -00:33 | 16:11 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 20:17 | 04:34 +00:33 | 21:18 -01:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:41 | 25:24 | 05:06 -00:25 | 25:52 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 30:05 | 04:54 -00:15 | 30:58 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 04:46 | 34:44 | 05:15 -00:29 | 35:52 -01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 39:30 | 04:41 +00:15 | 41:07 -01:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 44:26 | 05:08 -00:05 | 45:48 -01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 49:29 | 02:04 +00:17 | 50:56 -01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 51:50 | 05:07 +00:09 | 53:00 -01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 57:06 | 04:45 +00:01 | 58:07 -01:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:01:52 | 05:35 -00:11 | 01:02:52 -01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:07:16 | 05:58 +00:24 | 01:08:27 -01:11 |
| Roxzone | 07:06 | 01:20:36 | 06:11 +00:55 | 01:20:36 |
Chris Kavanagh has shown an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham event, securing a rank of 976 out of 4107 athletes, placing him in the Top 23%. In his age group (40-44), he ranks 164 out of 724 athletes, placing him in the Top 22%. His overall time of 01:20:36 reflects a well-rounded performance. Despite starting slightly slower in the first running segment, Chris quickly compensated in the subsequent segments, resulting in a total running time of 00:38:32, which is 02:07 faster than the average.
His performance indicates that he has a strong runner profile, with his best running lap at an impressive 00:04:09. His pacing appears to be generally well-managed, with a slow start but a consistent increase in speed in the later segments. There is room for improvement in the Roxzone segment where he spent 01:00 more than the average, indicating more resting time or slower transitions.
Chris should consider the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schoenborn Brian | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:20:39 | |
| Lang Mark | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:20:48 | |
| Holloway Matt | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:11 | |
| Voicescu Sorin | 2023 Valencia | 01:20:22 | |
| Wäsler Dominik | 2023 Köln | 01:20:06 | |
| Gallagher Chris | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:20:51 | |
| Chambeglain Raymond | 2024 Singapore | 01:20:52 | |
| Burr Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:37 | |
| Friggeri Julien | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:27 | |
| Baniewski Jakub | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:09:41 | |
| 2022 London | 01:15:13 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:18:47 | |
| 2023 London | 01:25:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
