Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Houghton Jamie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Houghton Jamie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Houghton Jamie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Houghton Jamie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:51 | 45:10 to 41:19 | 82.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 05:39 to 04:55 | 15.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 04:39 to 04:35 | 1.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:03 to 02:01 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Houghton Jamie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 04:35 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:37 | 04:25 -00:16 | 04:35 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:46 | 04:54 -00:01 | 09:00 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 14:39 | 02:52 -00:45 | 13:54 +00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 16:46 | 05:21 +00:05 | 16:46 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 22:12 | 04:51 -00:12 | 22:07 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 26:51 | 05:20 +00:16 | 26:58 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 32:27 | 05:14 +00:25 | 32:18 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 38:06 | 05:30 +00:27 | 37:32 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 44:03 | 04:47 -00:14 | 43:02 +01:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 48:36 | 05:21 +00:18 | 47:49 +00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 54:15 | 02:09 -00:06 | 53:10 +01:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 56:18 | 05:20 +00:22 | 55:19 +00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 01:02:00 | 05:01 -01:05 | 01:00:39 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:05:56 | 05:55 +00:29 | 01:05:40 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:12:20 | 06:24 -01:38 | 01:11:35 +00:45 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:24:40 | 06:41 +01:01 | 01:24:40 |
Jamie Houghton, competing in the HYROX category for the 30-34 age group, put forth a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. Jamie secured an overall rank of 1299, placing him in the top 31% of 4107 athletes. In his age group, Jamie's performance ranked him 304, which is in the top 37% of 813 athletes.
His total running time was 00:45:10, which was 02:39 slower than the average. This suggests that Jamie has a strength-focused profile, as his total running time was slower than average. His roxzone time was slower than average, indicating he took more time for transitions and rest, which is an area for improvement.
In terms of pacing, Jamie started slower than average in the first running segment but managed to maintain a good pace in subsequent running segments. However, his running times gradually slowed down towards the end of the race, indicating potential issues with endurance or pacing strategy.
To improve future performance, Jamie should consider implementing the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Völkel Torsten | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:24:22 | |
| Weijers Paul | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:29 | |
| Jezela Marcin | 2024 Gdansk | 01:24:53 | |
| Fotherby Alex | 2023 London | 01:24:47 | |
| Crittenden Sam | 2024 Sydney | 01:24:19 | |
| Jørgensen Mads Pontoppidan Gundorph | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:21 | |
| Schaap Mart | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:56 | |
| Van Baelen Sander | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:00 | |
| Verhagen Stefan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:36 | |
| Willeboordse Dennis | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:24:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
