Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hobbs Mitchell's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hobbs Mitchell's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hobbs Mitchell's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hobbs Mitchell's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:51 | 09:19 to 06:28 | 75.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 05:51 to 05:07 | 19.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:22 to 02:09 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:06 to 43:06 | 0.0% |
| Hobbs Mitchell | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:47 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:47 | 04:30 -00:07 | 04:45 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 10:10 | 05:06 +00:00 | 09:15 +00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 15:16 | 03:01 -00:20 | 14:21 +00:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 17:57 | 05:33 -00:24 | 17:22 +00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 23:06 | 05:09 -00:19 | 22:55 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 27:56 | 05:33 -00:21 | 28:04 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 33:08 | 05:39 -00:43 | 33:37 -00:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 38:04 | 05:44 -00:23 | 39:16 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 43:25 | 04:53 -00:11 | 45:00 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 48:07 | 05:35 -00:17 | 49:53 -01:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 53:25 | 02:16 +00:06 | 55:28 -02:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 55:47 | 05:34 -00:21 | 57:44 -01:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:01:00 | 05:23 +00:28 | 01:03:18 -02:18 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:06:51 | 06:15 -00:11 | 01:08:41 -01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 09:19 | 01:12:55 | 06:50 +02:29 | 01:14:56 -02:01 |
| Roxzone | 06:57 | 01:29:02 | 07:16 -00:19 | 01:29:02 |
Great job, Mitchell! Your overall performance for the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race was impressive. You ranked within the top 39% of 4107 athletes and within the top 37% of your age group. An impressive total running time of 00:43:06, which is 01:18 faster than the average, indicates a strong running profile. However, there is a noticeable disparity in your pacing as your first run was slower than average. As the race progressed, you adjusted your pace and performed faster on subsequent runs compared to the average. This signifies that you started a bit slower than expected but managed to recover as the race went on. You also displayed strength in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull segments, which all had faster times than the average.
Consider the following strategies for your future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robinson Gavin | 2023 New York | 01:29:15 | |
| Martin Garry | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:57 | |
| Londeix Aymeric | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:13 | |
| van de Lagemaat Laurens | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:28:52 | |
| Carson Aaron | 2023 Chicago | 01:29:06 | |
| Harper Justin | 2023 London | 01:29:17 | |
| Procter Steven | 2023 Manchester | 01:29:24 | |
| Taylor Philip | 2022 London | 01:28:50 | |
| Perea Santiago | 2024 Malaga | 01:29:25 | |
| Valentini Simone | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:39:19 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:37:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
