Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 520 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Greenhalgh Ashley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Greenhalgh Ashley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Greenhalgh Ashley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Greenhalgh Ashley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:50 | 05:14 to 04:24 | 34.7% |
| Run Total | 00:40 | 40:22 to 39:42 | 27.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:26 | 07:13 to 06:47 | 18.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:37 to 02:16 | 14.6% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:37 to 04:33 | 2.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 05:08 to 05:05 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Greenhalgh Ashley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:19 +00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 04:51 | 04:15 -00:12 | 04:19 +00:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:20 | 08:54 | 04:38 -00:18 | 08:34 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 13:14 | 03:52 -00:17 | 13:12 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:49 | 05:09 +00:06 | 17:04 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 22:04 | 06:40 -02:01 | 22:13 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 26:43 | 05:08 +00:05 | 28:53 -02:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 31:56 | 04:38 +00:36 | 34:01 -02:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 37:10 | 05:13 +00:07 | 38:39 -01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 42:30 | 04:37 +00:00 | 43:52 -01:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:53 | 47:07 | 05:06 -00:13 | 48:29 -01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 52:00 | 02:24 +00:13 | 53:35 -01:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 54:37 | 05:11 -00:07 | 55:59 -01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 59:41 | 05:19 -00:11 | 01:01:10 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 01:04:49 | 05:44 -00:16 | 01:06:29 -01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:13 | 01:10:17 | 07:13 +00:00 | 01:12:13 -01:56 |
| Roxzone | 08:20 | 01:25:43 | 06:17 +02:03 | 01:25:43 |
Ashley Greenhalgh delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, finishing in the top 42% of all participants and within the top 50% of his age group. His total running time was 12 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong proficiency in running. However, his start in the race, as indicated by Running 1, was slower than average, which may have impacted his overall rank. His strength exercises, highlighted by his exceptional performance in the Sled Pull, were notably faster than average, suggesting a well-rounded fitness profile. A key area for improvement is his Roxzone time which was significantly slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced transition speed and overall fitness.
For better race performance, Ashley should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Slatinsky Chazz | 2021 Dallas | 01:26:08 | |
| Syrett Lewis | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:18 | |
| Dorfner Ruben | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:08 | |
| Philippe Nicolas | 2023 Paris | 01:26:05 | |
| Riedlinger Thorben | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:25:57 | |
| Pinter Luca | 2024 Turin | 01:25:55 | |
| Sizemore Brody | 2021 Austin | 01:25:50 | |
| Stringer Caine | 2022 Manchester | 01:25:19 | |
| Bulley Gareth | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:52 | |
| Vaz Walter | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:25:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
