Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gilbertson Kirsty's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gilbertson Kirsty's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gilbertson Kirsty's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gilbertson Kirsty's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:59 | 52:05 to 47:06 | 87.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 05:38 to 04:54 | 12.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Gilbertson Kirsty | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:27 | 05:12 -00:30 | 05:18 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 10:09 | 05:42 +00:10 | 10:30 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 16:01 | 02:51 -00:51 | 16:12 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 18:01 | 06:01 -00:10 | 19:03 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 23:52 | 06:02 -00:44 | 25:04 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:24 | 29:10 | 06:02 +00:22 | 31:06 -01:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:24 | 35:34 | 06:37 -01:13 | 37:08 -01:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 40:58 | 06:13 +00:35 | 43:45 -02:47 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 47:46 | 05:28 -00:25 | 49:58 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 07:11 | 52:49 | 06:04 +01:07 | 55:26 -02:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 01:00:00 | 02:21 -00:16 | 01:01:30 -01:30 |
| Running 7 | 06:48 | 01:02:05 | 06:04 +00:44 | 01:03:51 -01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:08:53 | 05:04 +00:34 | 01:09:55 -01:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:47 | 01:14:31 | 06:34 +01:13 | 01:14:59 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 03:53 | 01:22:18 | 05:22 -01:29 | 01:21:33 +00:45 |
| Roxzone | 08:14 | 01:34:18 | 07:23 +00:51 | 01:34:18 |
Kirsty Gilbertson delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 392, placing her in the top 21% of all competitors. Within her age group, she ranked 75th, reflecting her competitive edge among peers aged 35-39. Despite the robust showings in strength events, her total running time was 3:27 slower than the average, indicating a stronger proficiency in strength-oriented exercises rather than running. Her initial running segments suggest a consistent pace, but later segments reveal a notable drop-off, indicating potential fatigue or pacing issues. Her performance profile suggests she has a hybrid capacity, with a strong inclination towards strength over running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vandrisse Manon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:59 | |
| Garza Andrea | 2024 Houston | 01:34:17 | |
| Van Heijster Anja | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:48 | |
| Belluco Jenny | 2024 Köln | 01:34:33 | |
| Mokudai Kristel Novie | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:47 | |
| Howlett Leanne | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:45 | |
| Cuffe Linda | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:06 | |
| Räth Nana | 2024 Hamburg | 01:34:04 | |
| Tonge Allana | 2023 Manchester | 01:33:56 | |
| Church Claire | 2022 London | 01:34:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
