Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eichhorn Henning's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eichhorn Henning's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eichhorn Henning's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eichhorn Henning's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:52 | 46:58 to 44:06 | 76.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 07:11 to 06:42 | 12.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:45 to 04:30 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:23 to 02:13 | 4.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:54 to 02:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Eichhorn Henning | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:26 | 00:00 | 04:48 +00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 05:26 | 04:32 +00:13 | 04:48 +00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 10:11 | 05:13 +00:07 | 09:20 +00:51 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 15:31 | 03:06 -00:12 | 14:33 +00:58 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 18:25 | 05:42 -00:05 | 17:39 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:32 | 24:02 | 05:18 -00:46 | 23:21 +00:41 |
| Running 4 | 05:54 | 28:34 | 05:40 +00:14 | 28:39 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 34:28 | 05:53 -00:26 | 34:19 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 39:55 | 05:52 +00:11 | 40:12 -00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 45:58 | 04:56 -00:19 | 46:04 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 50:35 | 05:42 +00:29 | 51:00 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 56:46 | 02:19 +00:04 | 56:42 +00:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 59:09 | 05:41 +00:18 | 59:01 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:05 | 01:05:08 | 05:32 -00:27 | 01:04:42 +00:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:10:13 | 06:25 +00:07 | 01:10:14 -00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 07:11 | 01:16:45 | 07:07 +00:04 | 01:16:39 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:31:19 | 07:33 -00:03 | 01:31:19 |
In terms of his overall time, Henning completed the race in 01:31:19. His total running time was 00:46:58, which was 03:19 slower than the average time. This indicates that Henning may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in future races.
Henning's best running lap was completed in 00:05:20, which is a strong performance. However, his splits analysis reveals areas where he could improve his performance.
By implementing these training strategies and techniques, Henning can work towards improving his performance in the identified areas and enhance his overall performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Player Jake | 2024 Sydney | 01:31:30 | |
| Brodie Darren | 2022 London | 01:31:00 | |
| Evans Kyle | 2023 Dallas | 01:31:28 | |
| Klar Andreas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:31:23 | |
| Szymczak Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:49 | |
| King Páidí | 2024 London | 01:31:05 | |
| BoyleSmith Dane | 2024 Madrid | 01:31:46 | |
| Fiore Dom | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:58 | |
| Hung Jacob Siu | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:31:28 | |
| Eriksson Mattias | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:26:52 | |
| 2023 Köln | 01:29:15 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
