Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clossparry Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clossparry Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clossparry Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clossparry Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:50 | 08:11 to 05:21 | 55.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:04 | 04:12 to 03:08 | 20.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 07:31 to 07:09 | 7.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:50 to 04:34 | 5.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 05:51 to 05:35 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:08 to 04:58 | 3.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:29 to 02:19 | 3.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:20 to 44:20 | 0.0% |
| Clossparry Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:58 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 03:52 | 04:35 +00:15 | 04:58 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 08:42 | 05:23 -00:11 | 09:33 -00:51 |
| Sled Push | 04:12 | 13:54 | 03:12 +01:00 | 14:56 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 18:06 | 05:53 -00:09 | 18:08 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 08:11 | 23:50 | 05:31 +02:40 | 24:01 -00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 32:01 | 05:52 -00:11 | 29:32 +02:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:10 | 37:42 | 06:09 -00:59 | 35:24 +02:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 42:52 | 06:04 -00:15 | 41:33 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 48:41 | 05:01 +00:07 | 47:37 +01:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 53:49 | 05:54 -00:06 | 52:38 +01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 59:37 | 02:24 +00:05 | 58:32 +01:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:02:06 | 05:53 -00:05 | 01:00:56 +01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:07:54 | 05:48 +00:03 | 01:06:49 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:29 | 01:13:45 | 06:46 -00:17 | 01:12:37 +01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 07:31 | 01:20:14 | 07:25 +00:06 | 01:19:23 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:34:46 | 07:58 -00:49 | 01:34:46 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Luke excelled in the running segments, consistently finishing faster than the average time. This suggests that he has a strong running profile and should focus on maintaining and improving his running ability. However, he struggled in the Sled Pull, Sled Push, Ski Erg, and Rowing segments, losing significant time compared to the average. These areas require improvement to enhance Luke's overall performance.
In conclusion, Luke Clossparry had a solid performance in the HYROX race, particularly excelling in the running segments. To further improve his performance, he should concentrate on strengthening his lower body for the Sled Pull and Sled Push segments. Additionally, developing his cardiovascular endurance and upper body strength will enhance his performance in the Ski Erg and Rowing segments. By implementing these training strategies and maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, Luke can continue to improve his overall performance in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oppelaar Martijn | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:34:52 | |
| Saez Castillo Samuel | 2023 Madrid | 01:35:07 | |
| Ho Edison | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:34:27 | |
| Cavana Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:05 | |
| Ng Daniel | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:48 | |
| ShurrockApps Colin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:58 | |
| Farrell Michael | 2022 Manchester | 01:35:06 | |
| Pawletta Michael | 2024 Köln | 01:35:09 | |
| Won Kevin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:50 | |
| Clarke Jack | 2022 London | 01:34:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
