Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clark Leigh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clark Leigh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clark Leigh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clark Leigh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:01 | 08:21 to 04:20 | 51.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 06:39 to 05:37 | 13.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:56 | 06:10 to 05:14 | 12.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:45 | 03:15 to 02:30 | 9.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 05:00 to 04:28 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 05:13 to 05:00 | 2.8% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:25 to 05:14 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:10 to 02:05 | 1.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:58 to 39:58 | 0.0% |
| Clark Leigh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 05:07 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 05:27 | 05:05 +00:08 | 05:07 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 10:40 | 05:25 -00:40 | 10:12 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 15:25 | 02:41 +00:34 | 15:37 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 04:53 | 18:40 | 05:43 -00:50 | 18:18 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 06:10 | 23:33 | 05:38 +00:32 | 24:01 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 29:43 | 05:45 -00:51 | 29:39 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 34:37 | 05:57 +00:42 | 35:24 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:03 | 41:16 | 05:53 -00:50 | 41:21 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 46:19 | 05:20 +00:05 | 47:14 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 51:44 | 05:47 -00:49 | 52:34 -00:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 56:42 | 02:15 -00:05 | 58:21 -01:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 58:52 | 05:45 -00:51 | 01:00:36 -01:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:00 | 01:03:46 | 04:41 +00:19 | 01:06:21 -02:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:07 | 01:08:46 | 06:07 -01:00 | 01:11:02 -02:16 |
| Wall Balls | 08:21 | 01:13:53 | 04:51 +03:30 | 01:17:09 -03:16 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:28:39 | 06:39 -00:07 | 01:28:39 |
Leigh Clark showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, landing in the top 11% of all athletes, and her age group. Her overall time was 01:28:39, with an impressive total running time of 00:39:58, which was 06:01 faster than the average competitor. This indicates she has a robust running profile and should focus on maintaining and even enhancing her running abilities.
Her pacing was particularly noteworthy in the first four running segments where she started slightly slower than average but rapidly increased her speed, consistently outpacing the average competitor. However, her roxzone time was slightly slower than average, suggesting the need for improvement in overall fitness and transition time.
To improve overall race performance, Leigh should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciret Mathilde | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:28:21 | |
| Sapino Giorgia | 2024 Milan | 01:28:47 | |
| Daniel Pamela | 2024 London | 01:28:19 | |
| Semenero Lauren | 2023 New York | 01:29:08 | |
| Bock Schoschana | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:14 | |
| Herzer Elisa | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:28:09 | |
| Makinson Amy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:58 | |
| Elias Valery | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:14 | |
| Wassersleben Jeanette | 2024 London | 01:28:38 | |
| Clark Leigh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
