Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chivers Jeremy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chivers Jeremy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chivers Jeremy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chivers Jeremy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 12:37 to 07:50 | 63.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:36 | 09:07 to 06:31 | 34.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:47 to 04:41 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:01 to 45:01 | 0.0% |
| Chivers Jeremy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:51 | 00:00 | 05:09 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 05:51 | 04:40 +00:07 | 05:09 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 10:38 | 05:36 -00:48 | 09:49 +00:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 15:26 | 03:24 -00:28 | 15:25 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 18:22 | 06:08 -00:44 | 18:49 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 23:46 | 05:54 -00:30 | 24:57 -01:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 29:10 | 06:06 -00:34 | 30:51 -01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:07 | 34:42 | 06:38 +02:29 | 36:57 -02:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 43:49 | 06:23 -00:29 | 43:35 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 49:43 | 05:08 -00:12 | 49:58 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 54:39 | 06:14 -00:29 | 55:06 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:00:24 | 02:33 -00:08 | 01:01:20 -00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 01:02:49 | 06:11 -00:30 | 01:03:53 -01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:08:30 | 06:17 -00:40 | 01:10:04 -01:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:14:07 | 07:11 -01:01 | 01:16:21 -02:14 |
| Wall Balls | 12:37 | 01:20:17 | 08:14 +04:23 | 01:23:32 -03:15 |
| Roxzone | 07:41 | 01:40:26 | 08:40 -00:59 | 01:40:26 |
Jeremy Chivers demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall time placed him in the top 53% of all 4107 athletes participating, and in the top 54% in his age group (40-44). One of the most impressive aspects of Jeremy's performance was his running time. He was 04:10 faster than the average for his finish time, indicating a strong affinity for running.
Based on his performance, Jeremy comes across as a hybrid athlete who has a stronger running profile. His faster than average total running time suggests that he has been training his running skills effectively. However, his pacing strategy needs a slight adjustment. His slow start in Running 1, being 00:45 slower than average, could be due to a conservative start strategy or lack of a proper warm-up. However, he could potentially improve his overall time by maintaining a more consistent pace throughout the race.
For better performance in future races, Jeremy should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wong Christopher | 2024 Singapore | 01:40:26 | |
| Barr Chris | 2024 Sydney | 01:40:14 | |
| Albert T Gray | 2024 Anaheim | 01:39:58 | |
| Ter Duis Jörn | 2023 Hannover | 01:40:39 | |
| Bennett James | 2023 Sydney | 01:40:17 | |
| O'Hara Mark | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:40:32 | |
| Welch Sam | 2023 Stockholm | 01:40:33 | |
| Milanese Andrea | 2024 Rimini | 01:40:39 | |
| Aguila Daniel | 2024 Mexico City | 01:40:11 | |
| Staer Marko | 2024 Berlin | 01:39:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:38:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
