Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Anderson Chloe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Anderson Chloe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Anderson Chloe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Anderson Chloe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:40 | 05:54 to 04:14 | 39.5% |
| Run Total | 01:38 | 45:33 to 43:55 | 38.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 05:59 to 05:29 | 11.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:24 to 02:04 | 7.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 05:03 to 04:58 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Anderson Chloe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 05:02 +01:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 06:32 | 05:03 +00:00 | 05:02 +01:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 11:35 | 05:19 -00:02 | 10:05 +01:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 16:52 | 02:39 -00:13 | 15:24 +01:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 19:18 | 05:36 -00:11 | 18:03 +01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 24:43 | 05:33 -00:54 | 23:39 +01:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 29:22 | 05:39 -00:19 | 29:12 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:59 | 34:42 | 05:48 +00:11 | 34:51 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 40:41 | 05:47 -00:09 | 40:39 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 46:19 | 05:18 -00:24 | 46:26 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 51:13 | 05:41 -00:04 | 51:44 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 56:50 | 02:11 +00:13 | 57:25 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 59:14 | 05:39 +00:02 | 59:36 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 01:04:55 | 04:36 -00:37 | 01:05:15 -00:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:08:54 | 06:04 +00:03 | 01:09:51 -00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:15:01 | 04:45 +01:09 | 01:15:55 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 06:29 | 01:27:15 | 06:35 -00:06 | 01:27:15 |
Chloe Anderson delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham event, ranking in the top 10% of all athletes and within the top 16% of her age group. A key aspect of her performance to highlight is her overall stamina and strength which was evident in her speedier than average times in the sled push, sled pull, rowing, and sandbag lunges. However, her total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a potential area of improvement. Based on these results, it appears that Chloe has a strength-oriented profile.
Given her strength-oriented profile, Chloe should consider conserving energy during the running segments to excel in the strength-oriented exercises where she naturally excels. Focusing on maintaining a steady pace rather than sprinting in the early running segments may help in conserving energy for later parts of the race. Additionally, practicing transitions between exercises can help shave off valuable seconds in the Roxzone. Incorporating these strategies along with the targeted training mentioned above can help Chloe improve her overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Raabe Carlee | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:44 | |
| Ullmann Anette | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:26:46 | |
| Potgieter Daniella | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:00 | |
| Wendel Jackie | 2019 Hamburg | 01:27:29 | |
| Schütze Katharina | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:27:40 | |
| Wilson Anna | 2023 London | 01:27:30 | |
| Pacheco Roca Laura | 2022 Valencia | 01:27:27 | |
| Huertas Vecina Lara | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:24 | |
| Bonte Jolanda | 2022 London | 01:27:44 | |
| Whittaker Claire | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
