Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Aegerter Henning J's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Aegerter Henning J's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Aegerter Henning J's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Aegerter Henning J's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:00 | 05:38 to 04:38 | 33.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 06:40 to 05:48 | 28.7% |
| Run Total | 00:33 | 41:12 to 40:39 | 18.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:38 to 04:20 | 9.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 04:37 to 04:28 | 5.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 04:55 to 04:46 | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Aegerter Henning J | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:31 +00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:48 | 04:24 +00:14 | 04:31 +00:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:15 | 09:26 | 04:52 -00:37 | 08:55 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 13:41 | 02:51 -00:33 | 13:47 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 02:52 | 15:59 | 05:17 -02:25 | 16:38 -00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 18:51 | 04:46 -00:09 | 21:55 -03:04 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 23:28 | 05:15 -00:31 | 26:41 -03:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:55 | 28:12 | 05:04 -00:09 | 31:56 -03:44 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 33:07 | 05:25 -00:28 | 37:00 -03:53 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 38:04 | 04:45 -00:16 | 42:25 -04:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 42:33 | 05:17 -00:15 | 47:10 -04:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 47:35 | 02:08 -00:11 | 52:27 -04:52 |
| Running 7 | 04:43 | 49:32 | 05:16 -00:33 | 54:35 -05:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 54:15 | 04:56 +00:42 | 59:51 -05:36 |
| Running 8 | 04:55 | 59:53 | 05:49 -00:54 | 01:04:47 -04:54 |
| Wall Balls | 06:40 | 01:04:48 | 06:17 +00:23 | 01:10:36 -05:48 |
| Roxzone | 12:03 | 01:23:24 | 06:31 +05:32 | 01:23:24 |
Based on the splits analysis, Henning performed well in several segments, particularly Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Running 5, Rowing, Running 6, Farmers Carry, Running 7, and Running 8. He consistently outperformed the average time in these segments, showcasing his strength and endurance.
However, there are areas where Henning can focus on for improvement. The segments with the most time lost were Roxzone, Best Lap, Sandbag Lunges, Run Total, Running 1, Wall Balls, and Ski Erg. These segments require attention to enhance overall performance.
Henning should also consider incorporating specific training sessions that mimic the race format, such as combining running with strength exercises. This will help him improve his ability to perform well in the hybrid nature of the HYROX race.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Henning can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| O'Hanlon Peter | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:47 | |
| Clarkson Matthew | 2023 London | 01:23:33 | |
| Wilkinson Craig | 2024 London | 01:23:43 | |
| Egremy Philippe | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:23:03 | |
| Simpson Paul | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:26 | |
| Richards Adam | 2022 Birmingham | 01:23:28 | |
| Curie Adrien | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:12 | |
| Russell Dylan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:47 | |
| Köppert Andre | 2022 Leipzig | 01:23:34 | |
| Pliet Max | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:23:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
