Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sarmiento Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sarmiento Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sarmiento Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sarmiento Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:07 | 07:42 to 05:35 | 44.1% |
| Run Total | 01:28 | 47:08 to 45:40 | 30.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 06:02 to 05:21 | 14.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 03:24 to 03:08 | 5.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:30 to 02:19 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:03 to 04:58 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:24 to 06:24 | 0.0% |
| Sarmiento Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:59 | 04:35 -00:04 | 04:58 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 09:30 | 05:23 +00:03 | 09:33 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:24 | 14:56 | 03:12 +00:12 | 14:56 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 18:20 | 05:52 +00:00 | 18:08 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 06:02 | 24:12 | 05:31 +00:31 | 24:00 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 30:14 | 05:52 -00:07 | 29:31 +00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 35:59 | 06:14 -01:18 | 35:23 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 40:55 | 06:05 -00:24 | 41:37 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 46:36 | 05:02 +00:01 | 47:42 -01:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 51:39 | 05:54 +00:05 | 52:44 -01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 57:38 | 02:25 +00:05 | 58:38 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:00:08 | 05:52 +00:29 | 01:01:03 -00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:42 | 01:06:29 | 05:50 +01:52 | 01:06:55 -00:26 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:14:11 | 06:48 +00:21 | 01:12:45 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 06:24 | 01:21:20 | 07:31 -01:07 | 01:19:33 +01:47 |
| Roxzone | 07:33 | 01:35:08 | 08:04 -00:31 | 01:35:08 |
Joe Sarmiento placed in the top 45% of the total participants and top 46% in his age group category. His overall time was 01:35:08, with a total running time of 00:47:08, which is on par with the average. This indicates a balanced performance between running and strength exercises. Notably, Joe performed exceptionally well in the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, showcasing his strength in exercises that require explosive power and endurance. However, his performance in Sandbag Lunges and the Sled Pull suggests opportunities for improvement. Joe's initial running segments were relatively consistent with the average, indicating he didn't start too fast or too slow, maintaining a steady pace throughout the race.
Joe significantly lagged in this segment. This indicates a need for enhanced leg strength and endurance. Specific exercises to improve include:
Improvement in upper body and core strength is needed to enhance performance in this segment. Recommended exercises include:
Joe's transition times were faster than average; however, further improvement can be achieved by refining transition efficiency. Strategies include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lo Jason | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:34:39 | |
| Svensson David | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:39 | |
| Veer Pascal | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:09 | |
| Slevin Peter | 2023 Dublin | 01:35:38 | |
| Willsmer Mark | 2022 London | 01:35:18 | |
| Ball Andrew | 2023 London | 01:35:29 | |
| Wyka Daniel | 2024 Katowice | 01:35:14 | |
| Lo Ocean | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:36 | |
| De Toma Vito | 2024 Milan | 01:35:09 | |
| Smith Samuel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
