Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 478 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Meara David P's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Meara David P's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Meara David P's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Meara David P's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:09 | 10:58 to 07:49 | 41.5% |
| Run Total | 01:57 | 55:32 to 53:35 | 25.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:35 | 08:46 to 07:11 | 20.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 04:30 to 04:01 | 6.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 03:18 to 02:56 | 4.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 06:52 to 06:49 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:31 to 08:31 | 0.0% |
| Meara David P | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:51 | 00:00 | 05:35 +01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 06:51 | 04:53 -00:05 | 05:35 +01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 11:39 | 06:13 -00:14 | 10:28 +01:11 |
| Sled Push | 04:30 | 17:38 | 04:02 +00:28 | 16:41 +00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 22:08 | 06:56 -00:33 | 20:43 +01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 06:52 | 28:31 | 06:57 -00:05 | 27:39 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 35:23 | 06:57 -00:29 | 34:36 +00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:58 | 41:51 | 08:10 +02:48 | 41:33 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:39 | 52:49 | 07:19 -00:40 | 49:43 +03:06 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 59:28 | 05:27 -00:16 | 57:02 +02:26 |
| Running 6 | 06:24 | 01:04:39 | 07:04 -00:40 | 01:02:29 +02:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:18 | 01:11:03 | 02:51 +00:27 | 01:09:33 +01:30 |
| Running 7 | 07:05 | 01:14:21 | 07:03 +00:02 | 01:12:24 +01:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:46 | 01:21:26 | 07:29 +01:17 | 01:19:27 +01:59 |
| Running 8 | 09:45 | 01:30:12 | 08:52 +00:53 | 01:26:56 +03:16 |
| Wall Balls | 08:31 | 01:39:57 | 09:45 -01:14 | 01:35:48 +04:09 |
| Roxzone | 07:56 | 01:56:15 | 10:42 -02:46 | 01:56:15 |
Pacing:
David's pacing was relatively consistent throughout the race. However, it is worth noting that his running 1 segment was 01:32 slower than average, indicating a slightly slower start. This suggests that he may benefit from working on his speed and endurance at the beginning of the race to set a stronger foundation for the rest of the event.
Profile:
Based on the total running time of 00:55:32, which was 02:17 slower than average, it appears that David's strength lies more in his overall fitness and transition time rather than his running ability. To improve his roxzone time, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing transition times. Additionally, he may benefit from incorporating more strength training into his routine to improve his running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hoen Jason | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:55:52 | |
| Kowalke Tim | 2022 Hamburg | 01:56:26 | |
| Boughanem Lias | 2024 Paris | 01:55:50 | |
| Moorthy Ashvath | 2023 Stockholm | 01:56:38 | |
| Ruiterman Patrick | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:55:57 | |
| Hilbers Joris | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:56:21 | |
| Kane David | 2024 Manchester | 01:56:41 | |
| Finnigan Peter | 2021 London | 01:56:17 | |
| Quacquarelli Massimo | 2024 Turin | 01:56:05 | |
| Smith Sean | 2024 Taipei | 01:55:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
