Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bakker Milo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bakker Milo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bakker Milo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bakker Milo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:33 | 10:49 to 07:16 | 62.8% |
| Run Total | 01:59 | 48:04 to 46:05 | 35.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 05:47 to 05:40 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:56 to 05:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Bakker Milo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:13 | 04:36 -00:07 | 04:58 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:46 | 08:42 | 05:24 +00:22 | 09:34 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 14:28 | 03:14 -00:45 | 14:58 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 16:57 | 05:53 +00:10 | 18:12 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 23:00 | 05:37 -00:56 | 24:05 -01:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 27:41 | 05:54 +00:13 | 29:42 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:56 | 33:48 | 06:20 -00:24 | 35:36 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 39:44 | 06:08 -00:10 | 41:56 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 45:42 | 05:03 -00:07 | 48:04 -02:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 50:38 | 05:56 +00:04 | 53:07 -02:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 56:38 | 02:26 -00:45 | 59:03 -02:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 58:19 | 05:55 +00:14 | 01:01:29 -03:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:04:28 | 05:54 -00:07 | 01:07:24 -02:56 |
| Running 8 | 07:51 | 01:10:15 | 06:48 +01:03 | 01:13:18 -03:03 |
| Wall Balls | 10:49 | 01:18:06 | 07:41 +03:08 | 01:20:06 -02:00 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:35:59 | 08:12 -01:02 | 01:35:59 |
Milo Bakker's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event places him in the top 52% of all athletes, and within the top 51% of his age group. His overall completion time was 01:35:59. Analyzing his pacing, Milo started strong, with Running 1 significantly faster than the average, suggesting a fast start. However, he gradually slowed down, particularly evident in the later running segments and the Wall Balls segment. His running profile appears to be more strength-oriented, as inferred from his faster-than-average performance in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Farmers Carry, but with room for improvement in overall running time, which was 00:42 slower than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lang Heinz | 2019 Wien | 01:36:26 | |
| Tzetzelos Dimitris | 2023 Barcelona | 01:36:07 | |
| Yoo Hyogyun | 2024 Incheon | 01:35:37 | |
| Sharlott Matthew | 2022 London | 01:35:38 | |
| Sleeman Mark | 2024 Sydney | 01:35:34 | |
| Loziak Adam | 2024 Gdansk | 01:35:34 | |
| Bryan Matt | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:47 | |
| Schubinski Cedric | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:23 | |
| Della Bona Davide | 2023 Rimini | 01:35:36 | |
| Sanfilippo Luigi | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
