Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Aw Ming Cheong's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Aw Ming Cheong's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Aw Ming Cheong's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Aw Ming Cheong's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:20 | 47:35 to 45:15 | 58.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:09 | 08:11 to 07:02 | 29.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:32 to 02:18 | 5.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:38 to 05:30 | 3.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 05:24 to 05:17 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Aw Ming Cheong | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:15 | 00:00 | 04:53 +01:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 06:15 | 04:34 -00:12 | 04:53 +01:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 10:37 | 05:20 -00:07 | 09:27 +01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 15:50 | 03:11 -00:50 | 14:47 +01:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 18:11 | 05:50 -00:12 | 17:58 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 23:49 | 05:29 -00:05 | 23:48 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 29:13 | 05:49 -00:02 | 29:17 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 35:00 | 06:08 -00:32 | 35:06 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 40:36 | 06:02 -00:11 | 41:14 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 46:27 | 04:59 -00:35 | 47:16 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 50:51 | 05:52 -00:06 | 52:15 -01:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 56:37 | 02:23 +00:09 | 58:07 -01:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 59:09 | 05:51 +00:05 | 01:00:30 -01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:05:05 | 05:42 -00:04 | 01:06:21 -01:16 |
| Running 8 | 07:11 | 01:10:43 | 06:39 +00:32 | 01:12:03 -01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 08:11 | 01:17:54 | 07:25 +00:46 | 01:18:42 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 07:58 | 01:33:59 | 07:52 +00:06 | 01:33:59 |
Ming Cheong Aw's performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox event placed him in the top 48% overall and top 52% within his age group, which demonstrates a commendable effort. His overall time of 01:33:59 reflects a solid effort, although there are marked areas for improvement. Notably, his running performance is an area of concern, with a total running time of 00:47:35, which is 54 seconds slower than the average. This suggests a strength bias due to his strong performance in strength exercises like the Sled Push and Rowing, where he ranked in the top 10%. Ming's pacing strategy also indicates a potentially conservative start, with the first run segment significantly slower than the average, suggesting an opportunity to adjust his pacing strategy for optimal performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zorzetto Leonardo | 2024 Rimini | 01:34:17 | |
| Gülzau Sebastian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:33:52 | |
| Teske Johannes | 2019 Hamburg | 01:33:42 | |
| Wheatcroft Richard | 2024 Köln | 01:34:02 | |
| Speechley Stuart | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:00 | |
| Russell Brandon | 2023 Dallas | 01:34:14 | |
| Brauer Sebastian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:34:23 | |
| Gallagher Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:04 | |
| Cheng Jacob | 2024 Singapore | 01:33:45 | |
| Hegarty Lorcan | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
