Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wück Martijn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wück Martijn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wück Martijn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wück Martijn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:44 | 49:28 to 47:44 | 47.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:00 | 07:00 to 06:00 | 27.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 06:49 to 06:27 | 10.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:46 to 02:29 | 7.8% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:15 to 05:05 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:46 to 04:40 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:06 to 07:06 | 0.0% |
| Wück Martijn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 05:05 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 03:50 | 04:39 +00:07 | 05:05 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:36 | 05:35 -00:04 | 09:44 -01:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 14:07 | 03:26 -01:22 | 15:19 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 16:11 | 06:07 -00:15 | 18:45 -02:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 22:03 | 05:52 -00:14 | 24:52 -02:49 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 27:41 | 06:05 -00:01 | 30:44 -03:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 33:45 | 06:35 +00:14 | 36:49 -03:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:36 | 40:34 | 06:21 +00:15 | 43:24 -02:50 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 47:10 | 05:08 +00:07 | 49:45 -02:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 52:25 | 06:09 +00:10 | 54:53 -02:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:46 | 58:44 | 02:31 +00:15 | 01:01:02 -02:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:39 | 01:01:30 | 06:08 +00:31 | 01:03:33 -02:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:00 | 01:08:09 | 06:12 +00:48 | 01:09:41 -01:32 |
| Running 8 | 08:41 | 01:15:09 | 07:09 +01:32 | 01:15:53 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 07:06 | 01:23:50 | 08:02 -00:56 | 01:23:02 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 08:55 | 01:39:42 | 08:38 +00:17 | 01:39:42 |
Given the results from the 2024 Amsterdam event, Martijn Wück's performance was relatively balanced, with a strong start in the first half of the race. His total running time was 00:49:28, which was only 00:41 slower than the average running time, suggesting that he has a hybrid profile with balanced strength and running abilities. However, his pacing could be improved as he started off faster than average in the first four running segments but slowed down towards the end. This indicates that he might have expended too much energy in the early stages, resulting in a decrease in performance in the latter half of the race.
In future races, Martijn should consider pacing himself more effectively throughout the race. Starting off at a steady pace and conserving energy for the latter half of the race could help improve his overall time. Additionally, focusing on his form during strength exercises could help reduce fatigue and injury risk, leading to improved performance. Finally, incorporating specific functional training exercises that mimic the movements in each segment could help improve his efficiency and speed in those segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Adam | 2022 Birmingham | 01:39:12 | |
| Obrien Mark | 2023 Sydney | 01:39:38 | |
| Thom Douglas | 2024 Glasgow | 01:39:59 | |
| Levy Benjamin | 2022 New York | 01:39:48 | |
| Flynnday Christian | 2023 Singapore | 01:39:42 | |
| Morales Moises | 2022 Dallas | 01:39:16 | |
| Day James | 2022 Manchester | 01:39:21 | |
| Pureta Dejan | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:40:04 | |
| Ruiz Teddy | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:40:10 | |
| Curran Tighe | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:39:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
