Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wormgoor Nando's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wormgoor Nando's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wormgoor Nando's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wormgoor Nando's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:16 | 40:58 to 37:42 | 66.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 06:19 to 05:06 | 24.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 02:40 to 02:18 | 7.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:15 to 04:11 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Wormgoor Nando | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:21 | 00:00 | 04:17 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 03:21 | 04:19 -00:04 | 04:17 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 07:36 | 04:34 +00:15 | 08:36 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 12:25 | 02:37 +00:03 | 13:10 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 15:05 | 04:56 +00:04 | 15:47 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 20:05 | 04:22 -00:25 | 20:43 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 05:11 | 24:02 | 04:54 +00:17 | 25:05 -01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:13 | 29:13 | 04:34 -01:21 | 29:59 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 32:26 | 05:02 +00:18 | 34:33 -02:07 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 37:46 | 04:37 -00:15 | 39:35 -01:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 42:08 | 04:57 +00:28 | 44:12 -02:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 47:33 | 01:59 -00:17 | 49:09 -01:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 49:15 | 04:55 +00:39 | 51:08 -01:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 54:49 | 04:29 -00:31 | 56:03 -01:14 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 58:47 | 05:21 +01:01 | 01:00:32 -01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 06:19 | 01:05:09 | 05:41 +00:38 | 01:05:53 -00:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:03 | 01:17:22 | 05:48 +00:15 | 01:17:22 |
Nando Wormgoor delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 533, placing him in the top 17% of athletes. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 140th, which puts him in the top 20%. His overall time of 01:17:22 showcases his determination and stamina. Analyzing his pacing strategy, Nando started strong with his first running segment significantly faster than the average, but his pace slowed considerably in subsequent runs. This suggests an initial burst of speed that tapered off, indicating a need for more consistent pacing. Additionally, his total running time was 01:38 slower than the average, suggesting a hybrid profile that could benefit from enhanced running endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noon Jack | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:17:24 | |
| Beck Jack | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:37 | |
| Brady Joseph | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:49 | |
| Kenyon Richard | 2023 Manchester | 01:17:17 | |
| Walker Peter | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:23 | |
| Mcgee Maximilian | 2024 London | 01:17:25 | |
| Fletcher Nathan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:17:30 | |
| Mccarthy Alan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:17:21 | |
| Chiappetta Federico | 2024 Sydney | 01:17:52 | |
| Legge Ryan | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
