Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wolff Ryan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wolff Ryan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wolff Ryan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wolff Ryan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:50 | 47:12 to 43:22 | 67.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:46 | 08:16 to 06:30 | 31.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:13 to 02:10 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Wolff Ryan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:44 | 04:30 -00:10 | 04:47 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:04 | 05:07 -00:22 | 09:17 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 13:49 | 03:03 -00:44 | 14:24 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 16:08 | 05:36 +00:34 | 17:27 -01:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 22:18 | 05:12 -00:18 | 23:03 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 27:12 | 05:35 +00:00 | 28:15 -01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:45 | 32:47 | 05:42 -01:57 | 33:50 -01:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:33 | 36:32 | 05:47 +00:46 | 39:32 -03:00 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 43:05 | 04:54 -00:14 | 45:19 -02:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 47:45 | 05:36 +00:20 | 50:13 -02:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 53:41 | 02:17 -00:04 | 55:49 -02:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 55:54 | 05:35 +00:30 | 58:06 -02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 01:01:59 | 05:26 -00:35 | 01:03:41 -01:42 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:06:50 | 06:16 +01:10 | 01:09:07 -02:17 |
| Wall Balls | 08:16 | 01:14:16 | 06:54 +01:22 | 01:15:23 -01:07 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:29:37 | 07:20 -00:11 | 01:29:37 |
Pacing:
Based on the splits analysis, Ryan's pacing was generally consistent throughout the race. However, he may have started too fast, as his best running lap was 00:04:44, which was 00:07 slower than average. This suggests that he may have expended too much energy early on, which could have impacted his performance in later segments.
Profile:
Ryan's total running time of 00:47:12 was 04:36 slower than average. This indicates that he may need to focus more on his running training to improve his overall performance. While he performed well in certain segments, such as Running 2 and Running 4, where he was faster than average, he struggled in Running 3, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7, where he was slower than average. This suggests that he may benefit from incorporating more running-specific workouts into his training regimen.
Overall, Ryan Wolff had a solid performance in the 2023 Melbourne Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, specifically in the identified segments, and implementing effective race strategies, he can continue to enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rutherford John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:18 | |
| Brizzolara Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:29:44 | |
| San Roman Mario | 2023 Anaheim | 01:29:29 | |
| Willis Adam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:50 | |
| O'Hern Rob | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:53 | |
| Little Joe | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:39 | |
| Schnabl Dominic | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:18 | |
| Liorel Guillaume | 2023 Paris | 01:29:54 | |
| Ave Robert | 2024 Berlin | 01:29:10 | |
| Chirco Benedikt Manlio | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
