Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vrancken Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vrancken Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vrancken Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vrancken Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:46 | 43:11 to 39:25 | 56.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:43 | 07:13 to 05:30 | 25.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 05:04 to 04:26 | 9.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 05:03 to 04:30 | 8.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Vrancken Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:18 | 00:00 | 04:23 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 03:18 | 04:21 -00:20 | 04:23 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 07:19 | 04:44 +00:18 | 08:44 -01:25 |
| Sled Push | 01:36 | 12:21 | 02:44 -01:08 | 13:28 -01:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 13:57 | 05:08 +00:06 | 16:12 -02:15 |
| Sled Pull | 03:12 | 19:11 | 04:36 -01:24 | 21:20 -02:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 22:23 | 05:06 +00:23 | 25:56 -03:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 27:52 | 04:55 +00:08 | 31:02 -03:10 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 32:55 | 05:15 +00:49 | 35:57 -03:02 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 38:59 | 04:41 -00:11 | 41:12 -02:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 43:29 | 05:09 +00:42 | 45:53 -02:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 49:20 | 02:04 -00:16 | 51:02 -01:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 51:08 | 05:07 +00:28 | 53:06 -01:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 56:43 | 04:46 +00:18 | 58:13 -01:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:41 | 01:01:47 | 05:36 +01:05 | 01:02:59 -01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 07:13 | 01:08:28 | 05:59 +01:14 | 01:08:35 -00:07 |
| Roxzone | 05:14 | 01:20:48 | 06:14 -01:00 | 01:20:48 |
Dennis Vrancken delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing in the top 24% overall and top 25% within his age group. His overall time of 01:20:48 showcases his competitive edge, particularly in strength-based events such as the Sled Push and Pull, where he ranked in the top 3 percentiles. However, his total running time was 02:15 slower than the average, indicating a need to focus on running efficiency. The analysis of the initial running segments suggests that Dennis started strong, especially in Running 1, but gradually slowed down. This pattern indicates a potential pacing issue where he may have started too fast and struggled to maintain the pace throughout the race. Dennis exhibits a strength-oriented profile, but could improve his performance by enhancing his running capabilities to achieve a more balanced hybrid profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Geoffrey | 2024 Perth | 01:20:33 | |
| Creel Samuel | 2023 Manchester | 01:20:48 | |
| Cheng Hang Kin | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:21:13 | |
| Barbero Ortiz Borja | 2024 Bilbao | 01:20:48 | |
| Stevens Jamie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:07 | |
| Zinken Sascha | 2023 Köln | 01:21:00 | |
| Buxton Charlie | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:20:41 | |
| Kelly Peter | 2023 Birmingham | 01:20:48 | |
| Burns John | 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:54 | |
| Brooks John | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
