Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verweij Coen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verweij Coen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verweij Coen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verweij Coen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:57 | 44:46 to 41:49 | 57.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:39 | 06:41 to 05:02 | 32.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 05:06 to 04:52 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:31 to 04:23 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 02:50 to 02:43 | 2.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:48 to 04:44 | 1.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Verweij Coen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:37 -01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 03:35 | 04:27 +00:04 | 04:37 -01:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 08:06 | 04:58 +00:06 | 09:04 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 13:10 | 02:55 -00:05 | 14:02 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:18 | 16:00 | 05:25 -00:07 | 16:57 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 21:18 | 04:59 -00:36 | 22:22 -01:04 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 25:41 | 05:24 +00:36 | 27:21 -01:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:41 | 31:41 | 05:20 +01:21 | 32:45 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:36 | 38:22 | 05:34 +01:02 | 38:05 +00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 44:58 | 04:49 -00:01 | 43:39 +01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 49:46 | 05:26 +00:20 | 48:28 +01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 55:32 | 02:11 -00:15 | 53:54 +01:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 57:28 | 05:24 +00:22 | 56:05 +01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:03:14 | 05:06 +00:00 | 01:01:29 +01:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:08:20 | 06:02 +00:43 | 01:06:35 +01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:15:05 | 06:33 -01:02 | 01:12:37 +02:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:37 | 01:26:05 | 06:55 -01:18 | 01:26:05 |
Coen Verweij delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank within the top 35% of participants. His total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement, particularly given his strong performance in strength-based exercises. This suggests that Coen has a balanced profile but could benefit from enhanced running capabilities. His impressive ranks in strength segments like the Wall Balls and Sled Pull highlight his proficiency in these areas. However, his performance in running segments, particularly in the latter half of the race, suggests he may have started too fast, exhausting his energy reserves.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Greig David | 2024 Berlin | 01:26:13 | |
| Tibble Kevin | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:47 | |
| Zimmermann Johannes | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:25:49 | |
| Fonseca Andre | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:25:35 | |
| Kozlowski Karol | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:26:16 | |
| Koble Cody | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:25:36 | |
| UCEDA FREDY | 2024 New York | 01:26:16 | |
| Pitman Benjamin | 2023 Dallas | 01:25:48 | |
| Felice Marino | 2024 Sydney | 01:25:59 | |
| Regniers Stéphane | 2024 Paris | 01:26:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:54 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
