Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verhage Otto's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verhage Otto's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verhage Otto's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verhage Otto's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 05:35 to 04:14 | 29.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:18 | 06:32 to 05:14 | 28.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:45 to 04:14 | 11.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 04:29 to 04:04 | 9.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:46 to 02:22 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:32 to 04:13 | 7.0% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:40 to 04:32 | 2.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:56 to 01:49 | 2.6% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:34 to 37:34 | 0.0% |
| Verhage Otto | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:26 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:26 | 04:20 +00:12 | 04:19 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 07:58 | 04:37 +00:08 | 08:39 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 12:43 | 02:40 +00:06 | 13:16 -00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 15:29 | 05:00 +00:01 | 15:56 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 20:30 | 04:26 +00:03 | 20:56 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 04:53 | 24:59 | 04:59 -00:06 | 25:22 -00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 29:52 | 04:38 +00:57 | 30:21 -00:29 |
| Running 5 | 04:53 | 35:27 | 05:07 -00:14 | 34:59 +00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 40:20 | 04:39 +00:01 | 40:06 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 45:00 | 05:01 -00:13 | 44:45 +00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 49:48 | 02:01 -00:05 | 49:46 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 51:44 | 05:00 -00:15 | 51:47 -00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 56:29 | 04:33 +00:12 | 56:47 -00:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:07 | 01:01:14 | 05:27 -00:20 | 01:01:20 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 06:32 | 01:06:21 | 05:44 +00:48 | 01:06:47 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 05:43 | 01:18:26 | 05:55 -00:12 | 01:18:26 |
Otto Verhage delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 19% overall and top 20% within his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, suggesting a strong runner profile. Otto's pacing was balanced, neither starting too fast nor too slow, although his initial running segment was impressively fast. This indicates a potential for higher endurance and stamina, which he can leverage further. However, his strength segments, such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, reveal opportunities for improvement, indicating a need to focus on strength training to complement his strong running ability.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorlijn Arnoud | 2023 Malmö | 01:17:56 | |
| Beggan Mel | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:54 | |
| Stairiker Christopher | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:18:14 | |
| Wakeham Simon | 2023 London | 01:18:21 | |
| Gervacio Toledo Martín | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:51 | |
| Braidwood Danny | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:17 | |
| Van Klaveren Simeon | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:09 | |
| Gameros Olivas Omar René | 2024 Mexico City | 01:18:51 | |
| Mortlock Daniel | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:01 | |
| Dobbertin Niclas | 2024 Berlin | 01:18:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
