Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Rietschoten Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Rietschoten Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Rietschoten Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Rietschoten Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:36 | 01:01:43 to 49:07 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Van Rietschoten Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 05:13 -01:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:56 | 04:42 -00:37 | 05:13 -01:17 |
| Running 2 | 08:31 | 08:01 | 05:46 +02:45 | 09:55 -01:54 |
| Sled Push | 01:34 | 16:32 | 03:29 -01:55 | 15:41 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 08:45 | 18:06 | 06:22 +02:23 | 19:10 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 26:51 | 06:02 -01:20 | 25:32 +01:19 |
| Running 4 | 08:42 | 31:33 | 06:20 +02:22 | 31:34 -00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 40:15 | 06:54 -01:26 | 37:54 +02:21 |
| Running 5 | 09:15 | 45:43 | 06:37 +02:38 | 44:48 +00:55 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 54:58 | 05:14 -00:27 | 51:25 +03:33 |
| Running 6 | 08:49 | 59:45 | 06:23 +02:26 | 56:39 +03:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:08:34 | 02:36 -00:38 | 01:03:02 +05:32 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 01:10:32 | 06:23 +00:00 | 01:05:38 +04:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:18 | 01:16:55 | 06:28 -02:10 | 01:12:01 +04:54 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:21:13 | 07:36 -00:10 | 01:18:29 +02:44 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:28:39 | 08:27 -03:25 | 01:26:05 +02:34 |
| Roxzone | 10:13 | 01:43:44 | 09:12 +01:01 | 01:43:44 |
Nick Van Rietschoten's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race showcased a strong proficiency in strength-based exercises but highlighted areas for improvement in running. Despite finishing in the top 61% overall, his total running time was 10:37 slower than the average, indicating a need to enhance his running efficiency. Notably, his initial running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting a tendency to start too quickly, which may have contributed to a decline in pace during later running segments. Nick's strength in exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Wall Balls indicates a strong power and endurance profile, aligning more with strength rather than running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennant Jethro | 2023 London | 01:43:30 | |
| Van Roozendaal Maurits | 2024 Madrid | 01:43:14 | |
| Karstens Sven | 2018 Hamburg | 01:43:30 | |
| Griepentrog Kai | 2019 Hamburg | 01:43:37 | |
| Pe Benito Dixon James | 2024 Turin | 01:43:29 | |
| Thomas Sam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:36 | |
| Hoang Dang | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:30 | |
| Cerezo Fernández Miguel | 2022 Madrid | 01:43:58 | |
| Linstead Jack | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:46 | |
| Somborski Igor | 2024 Maastricht | 01:43:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
