Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Leeuwen Rick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Leeuwen Rick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Leeuwen Rick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Leeuwen Rick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:58 | 42:24 to 39:26 | 55.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:34 | 06:04 to 04:30 | 29.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:19 to 01:54 | 7.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 05:53 to 05:30 | 7.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Van Leeuwen Rick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 03:24 | 04:21 -00:06 | 04:22 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 07:39 | 04:44 +00:17 | 08:43 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 12:40 | 02:44 -00:27 | 13:27 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 14:57 | 05:07 +00:10 | 16:11 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 20:14 | 04:35 -00:58 | 21:18 -01:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 23:51 | 05:06 +00:22 | 25:53 -02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 29:19 | 04:54 +01:10 | 30:59 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 35:23 | 05:15 +00:23 | 35:53 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 41:01 | 04:41 -00:14 | 41:08 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 45:28 | 05:08 +00:36 | 45:49 -00:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 51:12 | 02:04 +00:15 | 50:57 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 53:31 | 05:07 +00:25 | 53:01 +00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:26 | 59:03 | 04:45 -00:19 | 58:08 +00:55 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:03:29 | 05:35 +00:48 | 01:02:53 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:53 | 01:09:52 | 05:58 -00:05 | 01:08:28 +01:24 |
| Roxzone | 05:03 | 01:20:40 | 06:14 -01:11 | 01:20:40 |
Rick Van Leeuwen delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing within the top 24% of all competitors. His strength lies in the strength-based exercises, as evidenced by his quick times in segments like the Sled Push and Sled Pull. However, his overall running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Rick started the race too aggressively, with an impressive Running 1 split, but his pace gradually slowed in subsequent running segments. This suggests an initial pace imbalance that may have affected his endurance later in the race. Overall, Rick exhibits a hybrid profile with a slight inclination towards strength-based activities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bahlouli Alix | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:20:18 | |
| Riphagen Robert | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:35 | |
| Donaldson Michael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:44 | |
| Van Den Berg Mark | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:20:11 | |
| Bucklitsch Tim | 2024 Hamburg | 01:20:17 | |
| Robb Andy | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:55 | |
| Leroux Steve | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:20:31 | |
| Farnan Patrick | 2023 Melbourne | 01:20:35 | |
| Newman Richard | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:04 | |
| Mcphee Mark | 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
