Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Latum Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Latum Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Latum Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Latum Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:35 | 44:17 to 38:42 | 88.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:32 | 05:51 to 05:19 | 8.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:24 to 04:14 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:11 to 03:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Van Latum Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:05 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 04:05 | 04:20 +00:04 | 04:20 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:42 | 08:29 | 04:40 +01:02 | 08:40 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 01:47 | 14:11 | 02:41 -00:54 | 13:20 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 15:58 | 05:03 +00:48 | 16:01 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 03:28 | 21:49 | 04:28 -01:00 | 21:04 +00:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 25:17 | 05:02 +00:53 | 25:32 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:11 | 31:12 | 04:45 -01:34 | 30:34 +00:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:39 | 34:23 | 05:11 +00:28 | 35:19 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 04:21 | 40:02 | 04:40 -00:19 | 40:30 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 44:23 | 05:04 +00:27 | 45:10 -00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 49:54 | 02:02 -00:16 | 50:14 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 51:40 | 05:03 +00:28 | 52:16 -00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:18 | 57:11 | 04:38 -00:20 | 57:19 -00:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:01:29 | 05:31 +00:36 | 01:01:57 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:07:36 | 05:50 +00:01 | 01:07:28 +00:08 |
| Roxzone | 05:56 | 01:19:16 | 05:58 -00:02 | 01:19:16 |
Tim Van Latum delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 20% overall and top 22% within his age group. However, analysis shows that Tim has a stronger profile in strength-based activities compared to running. His total running time was notably slower than the average by 4 minutes, indicating room for improvement in this area. Despite this, Tim excelled in strength segments like the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump, ranking within the top 10% for these activities. His early running segments were relatively strong, but as the race progressed, his pace slowed down, suggesting a need to manage energy exertion more efficiently throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanz Tobias | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:00 | |
| Dileo Samuel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:09 | |
| Halus Woll Benedikt | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:07 | |
| Cecchin Giulio | 2024 Rimini | 01:19:18 | |
| Potier Renaud | 2023 Paris | 01:19:12 | |
| Redfern Michael | 2024 London | 01:19:34 | |
| Sugatan Justin | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:19:41 | |
| Correia João | 2021 Madrid | 01:19:11 | |
| Casarin Nicola | 2024 Rimini | 01:19:06 | |
| Butti Alessandro | 2024 Milan | 01:18:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
