Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 159 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Hooijdonk Chantal's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Hooijdonk Chantal's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Hooijdonk Chantal's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Hooijdonk Chantal's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:49 | 01:06:00 to 59:11 | 74.2% |
| Sled Pull | 02:04 | 10:16 to 08:12 | 22.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 09:54 to 09:39 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:48 to 05:45 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:08 to 03:08 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 06:05 to 06:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:50 to 06:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:04 to 07:04 | 0.0% |
| Van Hooijdonk Chantal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:18 | 00:00 | 06:30 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:48 | 05:18 | 05:41 +00:07 | 06:30 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 07:44 | 11:06 | 07:14 +00:30 | 12:11 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 18:50 | 03:45 -00:37 | 19:25 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 08:12 | 21:58 | 07:51 +00:21 | 23:10 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 10:16 | 30:10 | 08:12 +02:04 | 31:01 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 07:50 | 40:26 | 07:54 -00:04 | 39:13 +01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:54 | 48:16 | 10:17 -00:23 | 47:07 +01:09 |
| Running 5 | 08:17 | 58:10 | 08:23 -00:06 | 57:24 +00:46 |
| Rowing | 06:05 | 01:06:27 | 06:08 -00:03 | 01:05:47 +00:40 |
| Running 6 | 08:17 | 01:12:32 | 08:02 +00:15 | 01:11:55 +00:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:20:49 | 03:00 -00:46 | 01:19:57 +00:52 |
| Running 7 | 09:24 | 01:23:03 | 08:11 +01:13 | 01:22:57 +00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:50 | 01:32:27 | 07:27 -00:37 | 01:31:08 +01:19 |
| Running 8 | 11:02 | 01:39:17 | 09:27 +01:35 | 01:38:35 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 07:04 | 01:50:19 | 08:21 -01:17 | 01:48:02 +02:17 |
| Roxzone | 09:34 | 02:06:49 | 10:26 -00:52 | 02:06:49 |
Chantal Van Hooijdonk demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 33% overall and top 31% within her age group. Her performance showcased a strong balance between running and strength disciplines, with notable proficiency in strength-based exercises as evidenced by her fast sled push and farmers carry times. However, her total running time was slightly slower than average by 43 seconds, indicating potential for improvement in endurance running. Additionally, Chantal's pacing strategy was slightly inconsistent, starting strong in Running 1 but gradually slowing down in subsequent running segments, suggesting she might have started too fast.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noonan Andra | 2024 Dublin | 02:06:35 | |
| Lloyd Hayley | 2024 London | 02:06:59 | |
| Gurewitz Kathryn | 2022 Los Angeles | 02:06:59 | |
| Flohr Annemarie | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:06:44 | |
| Quinn Jolana | 2020 Chicago | 02:07:15 | |
| Menon Dharshini | 2024 Melbourne | 02:06:28 | |
| Romeijnkeeman Kittie | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:06:28 | |
| Vierbergen Marijke | 2022 Amsterdam | 02:07:12 | |
| Meristo Ruth | 2023 Malmö | 02:06:31 | |
| Quigley Dionne | 2024 Madrid | 02:07:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
