Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 713 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Herk Tommy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Herk Tommy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Herk Tommy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Herk Tommy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 10:37 | 01:02:40 to 52:03 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:22 to 07:22 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:10 to 07:10 | 0.0% |
| Van Herk Tommy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 05:00 | 04:48 +00:02 | 05:25 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 07:20 | 09:50 | 06:02 +01:18 | 10:13 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 17:10 | 03:41 -00:06 | 16:15 +00:55 |
| Running 3 | 07:31 | 20:45 | 06:44 +00:47 | 19:56 +00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 28:16 | 06:34 -01:41 | 26:40 +01:36 |
| Running 4 | 08:07 | 33:09 | 06:43 +01:24 | 33:14 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:22 | 41:16 | 07:41 -00:19 | 39:57 +01:19 |
| Running 5 | 08:23 | 48:38 | 07:03 +01:20 | 47:38 +01:00 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 57:01 | 05:21 -00:04 | 54:41 +02:20 |
| Running 6 | 08:18 | 01:02:18 | 06:52 +01:26 | 01:00:02 +02:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:10:36 | 02:44 -00:42 | 01:06:54 +03:42 |
| Running 7 | 07:59 | 01:12:38 | 06:51 +01:08 | 01:09:38 +03:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:48 | 01:20:37 | 07:01 -01:13 | 01:16:29 +04:08 |
| Running 8 | 10:05 | 01:26:25 | 08:23 +01:42 | 01:23:30 +02:55 |
| Wall Balls | 07:10 | 01:36:30 | 09:13 -02:03 | 01:31:53 +04:37 |
| Roxzone | 07:46 | 01:51:19 | 10:13 -02:27 | 01:51:19 |
Tommy Van Herk's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event shows a balanced skill set with room for improvement, especially in running. His overall rank was 2033 out of 3118 athletes, placing him in the top 65%. Within his age group (40-44), he ranked 265 out of 422, landing in the top 62%. His total running time was 01:02:40, which was 08:10 slower than average, indicating a need to enhance his running endurance and speed. His strength segments, such as the Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls, were significantly faster than average, highlighting a strong performance in strength-based exercises. This suggests a strength-focused profile with a need to concentrate on improving running efficiency. The pacing analysis indicates that Tommy started strong but gradually slowed down, suggesting he might have exerted too much energy early on.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pozzebon Luciano | 2024 Rimini | 01:51:09 | |
| Grimmler Michael | 2019 Hamburg | 01:51:03 | |
| Allegrini Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:51:07 | |
| Bonifaz Carlos | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:51:31 | |
| Dankwah Yaw | 2024 Manchester | 01:50:52 | |
| Pearman Chris | 2024 London | 01:50:49 | |
| Raccagni Giovanni Luigi | 2023 Milan | 01:51:21 | |
| Berthoud Olivier | 2023 Paris | 01:51:03 | |
| Mpinda Dumisani | 2024 Melbourne | 01:51:45 | |
| Luke Anthony | 2024 Malaga | 01:51:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
